Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm curious, since you obviously spent a lot of money on your cameras and glass, why you chose the 50/1.4 instead of the 50/1.2? I'm guessing you're refering to the Noct-Nikkor 1,2. I've actually used one on an F2 before I made the switch to digital. 1) It's a manual lens and I generally work AF, unless I'm shooting macro. 2) The 1.4 is sharper, but on cropping sensors I suspect the 1.2 is pretty sharp. 3) It's too expensive for a lens I'll not use much. In fact the Sigma 30mm 1.4 is a better pick. 4) In fact, the inexpensive 50mm 1.8 offers pro quality fast glass for about 100 bucks. The 1.4 has shallow DOF and the 1.2 is really a specialty lens. I've seen some at star parties on RFTs. RB 35s5 NY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Capt. Mooron, a pale shadow of a man? | ASA | |||
Crantz Babtizing Mooron | ASA | |||
Before ya shove off Canook! | ASA | |||
Capt Mooron ride a horse | ASA | |||
Capt Mooron ride a horse | ASA |