Peter wrote:
.. Follow the money.
Assassinate the paymasters. Capture, try & execute people who attempt
to blow up other people, or shoot them in the field if caught in the
act. I don't have a problem with any of that.

PDW

Got ya..assassinating would be much cleaner, and we would not to have
to have a bunch of panty waste liberal boo FN hooin wussies whining
about questioning murderers before we put them on trial...

Ohhh Boy, Peter state sponsered assassination is illegal. Who decides
who to assassinate ?

BTW we have captured, and we will execute the people found guilty in a
trial, or lock them away for the rest of their lives, thats what your
bitching about remember?

Joe

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 06:18:31 -0700, Joe wrote:


BTW we have captured, and we will execute the people found guilty in a
trial, or lock them away for the rest of their lives, thats what your
bitching about remember?

Don't be so sure. This administrations handling of these prisoners may
preclude any finding of guilt. While they are trying very hard to
overcome those pesky V & VI Amendments, let's pray they fail. "Secret
evidence", coerced evidence, and retroactive authorizing interrogation
tactics have yet to become the American way.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...090701456.html

thunder wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 06:18:31 -0700, Joe wrote:


BTW we have captured, and we will execute the people found guilty in a
trial, or lock them away for the rest of their lives, thats what your
bitching about remember?

Don't be so sure. This administrations handling of these prisoners may
preclude any finding of guilt. While they are trying very hard to
overcome those pesky V & VI Amendments, let's pray they fail. "Secret
evidence", coerced evidence, and retroactive authorizing interrogation
tactics have yet to become the American way.

The V says...(not that it applies to war & terrorist without countries)
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in
actual service in time of War or public danger; "

Both amendments are for citizens of America, for the people who fought
and died for thoses rights, they are not for captured terrorists or war
combatants. They do not even deserve the right afforded by the geneva
convention, as the are fanatical jihad dogs without a country.

War crimes are delt with by military tribunals, don't like it...don't
attack Americans and start a war, and get captured.

Joe



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...090701456.html

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:04:41 -0700, Joe wrote:


War crimes are delt with by military tribunals, don't like it...don't
attack Americans and start a war, and get captured.


Brigadier General James Walker, the top uniformed lawyer for the Marines,
said no civilized country should deny a defendant the right to see the
evidence against him, and that the United States "should not be the
first."



From:

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/...0908detain.php

thunder wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:04:41 -0700, Joe wrote:


War crimes are delt with by military tribunals, don't like it...don't
attack Americans and start a war, and get captured.


Brigadier General James Walker, the top uniformed lawyer for the Marines,
said no civilized country should deny a defendant the right to see the
evidence against him, and that the United States "should not be the
first."



Sounds like a smart Jarhead...if there is such a thing.

Joe


From:

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/...0908detain.php