Bushco is never wrong... at least they never admit it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On 28 Jun 2006 13:35:02 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:24:10 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Yeah, I guess that's why Bush is so upset with them about the SWIFT
story.
They write fiction, right?

My favorite section of the Times in page 2. That's where they tell you
about
the mistakes they made in the last edition, or at least the ones they have
to admit to. The corrections are hilarious. Today's said their front page
story yesterday "referred incorrectly" to the Israeli soldier that was
captured recently. The article had said he was the first to be captured.
The
correction said he was the fourth since 1990.

Note they never say they got it wrong--just that they "referred
incorrectly"
when they said one instead of four.

"Sorry, judge. I referred incorrectly to the light when I said it was
green.
It was red."

Hey, that tactic works so well for the Bush Administration, why
shouldn't the Times be allowed to use it too?

Every mistake Bush makes WRT Iraq gets blamed on "Bad Intelligence"

The only difference is that Bushco never voluntarily makes retractions
or corrections.

CWM