Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thom Stewart" wrote
You're way way off Key, Go sit in the corner with Dave! It was decided, years ago. that gasoline was THE preferred fuel. .... It is the standard fuel used in the Lab. Octane Engine. So, now that you know Lab Octane, you and Dave. I ask the question of both of you. What is High Octane. Also, Tell us the difference between Lab. Octane, Chemical Octane, and Road Octane. The difference is simply in the way you measure detonation resistance (octane rating) and is meaningless to the discussion. Over 50 years ago "octane rating" was indeed the percent of Octane in the fuel. However, before WW2 we found additives, most notably tetraethel lead, that when added in microscopic quantities, made heptane et al act even better than pure Octane, giving us octane ratings of well over 100 in pump gas. This permitted higher cylinder pressures prior to ignition, without detonation, and that provided more powerful and more economic cars. The Ethel Corp held patents and made a lot of royalties off this process. Compression ratio is often quoted but is only one determinate of precombustion pressure. Then California became overcrowded and began whining about 'smog' that burned eyes long before anybody else noticed. Scientist determined that this was caused by NOx, which could be reduced by lowering precombustion pressure. About the same time "big oil" determined they could make bigger profits if they weren't paying royalties to the Ethel Corp and that they could sell more gas if cars got poorer gas mileage. So Congress invented EPA and it promptly mandated that all cars run on unleaded regular. The next year gas mileage in typical family sedans dropped from 18-22 mpg down to 12-15 mpg and, in less than a decade there was a gas shortage that trippled the price. Since then, cars have become more fuel efficient, but ever more expensive, by using high-dollar engine management systems once found only on Indy and F-1 GP cars, and the family sedan has become a thing of the past, but every gain has been matched and overcome by population increases. Obviously, we could reduce our gasoline consumption by almost 50% by simply disestablishing EPA and its rules! Last I read we imported 60% of our oil. Not all oil is used for gasoline but improving gas mileage by over 1/3 would go a long way toward reducing that. Crazy? My 1957 Renault 4dr sedan got 45 mpg using an archaic motor. What could it have gotten with today's technology? I have nothing against ethanol IF it can provide a similar gain. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ethanol; working now | ASA | |||
Ethanol; working now | ASA | |||
Ethanol; working now | ASA | |||
Ethanol: A Tragedy in 3 Acts | ASA | |||
Problems with E-85 by Ed Wallace of Businessweek... | General |