| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article . net,
Maxprop wrote: "Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. In article et, Maxprop wrote: America has sold herself out by not having the foresight to change with the changing world. America can compete nicely with just about anyone, but some changes are necessary. To compete with one's competitors, one must at the very least emulate them. Better yet one should create a cost advantage for the same quality, or create a quality advantage for the same cost. The US is capable of doing either, or both. Yeah, but you don't. Instead you try to either convince your market that an inferior prodict is somehow better via clever advertising, No one with even a modicum of intelligence is buying that anymore. That's why the companies building such products are struggling. Some of the power tools coming out of China really aren't too bad for the price. I bought a 4 1/2" angle grinder for $25. It vibrates a bit more than my 5" Metabo but that one cost 10X the price. Ditto with circular saws - I bought a cheapie to use with a metal cutting blade. I figured I'd destroy the bearings on the job and I did. Better a $59 saw than my good $200 one. Besides the cheapie had a 2 year home handyman warranty so I just took it back & got another one. I was upfront on what I'd being using it for; the shop guy said the distributor just replaces them without question. That gives me some idea of the markup between manufacturer and me. There's a place for lower quality stuff provided the price reflects it. You're right tho - people have woken up to the advertising cons. And CEOs and other top-level execs are going to have to face the fact that multi-million dollar annual salaries and golden parachutes aren't compatible with the world economic markets of the day. Yeah, I agree. The cost of screwing up a business needs to be brought home to those responsible. At the moment it seems that the stock holders lose, and employees lose, but senior management are immune due to their payment structures. It only takes a few years at $20 million per, plus a golden parachute to feather one's nest rather plushly. Again, it sucks, but what's a mother to do? Make misfeasance a civil offence and strip them of the protection of bankruptcy laws. You could apply a floor so that the law only applied to people running companies with more than $X capitalisation and in receipt of more than $Y salary/bonuses/stock options. Possibly pay them in stock options exercisable only 5 years after they leave the company. Lots of possibilities to concentrate their minds....... My take? Neither side will give an inch before the whole thing collapses into a ruined American economy. I hope to be sailing somewhere in the Caribbean with my money in offshore banks by then. I plan on being in a nice 3rd World country with a good climate. Fortunately for me NZ is only a week's sailing away. OTOH right where I am is pretty good, too. I bought a piece of just-off-the-beachfront land on a small island a year ago. You have to understand that in the Caribbean, the higher up on the hill, the more expensive and desirable the property. So mine is at the bottom of the food chain, so to speak. But a small dwelling with a good, solid roof will do me fine. And a boat--gotta have a boat. This is why I returned to Oz from Arizona. Got my waterfront place on a few acres, got a small boat and a bigger one is on the list. Moderate sized nice city with good facilities is 30 minute drive away. Modern large city is 1 hour flying time - Melbourne - or 2 hours flying time to Sydney. I built my own house and a big shed/barn for all the tools is next. PDW |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New Found Metals will sue me if I tell my | Boat Building | |||
| RE NFM Ports | Boat Building | |||
| New Found Metals: How NFM tests their ports | Cruising | |||
| New Found Metals Ports: They will sue me if I tell my story | ASA | |||
| Scandvik ports | Cruising | |||