I would think that being over 20 years would qualify.

"katy" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early fiberglass
constriction, and cannot be found everywhere. There's a difference
between just being old and popular and being a cult classic.

In article , Bart Senior .@. wrote:
I would think that being over 20 years would qualify.

"katy" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early fiberglass
constriction, and cannot be found everywhere. There's a difference
between just being old and popular and being a cult classic.

I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)



--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article , Bart Senior .@. wrote:

I would think that being over 20 years would qualify.

"katy" wrote

I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early fiberglass
constriction, and cannot be found everywhere. There's a difference
between just being old and popular and being a cult classic.


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)



Hey, I resemble that remark!

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?


Scotty

Scotty,

I think those women WOULDN"T.



http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage

http://community.webtv.net/tassail/Pneuma

In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?

Outside wood, pink on the inside, and flexed quite a bit. They also
had some other interesting characteristics. :-)


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?

Outside wood,

Didn't you get splinters?

In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?

Outside wood,

Didn't you get splinters?


I meant outside steel... iron lungs. :-)
--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or
early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as
cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?

Outside wood,

Didn't you get splinters?


I meant outside steel... iron lungs. :-)


Oh, rust stains.