Can you call a mainstream boat like the J-24 a cult boat?

I think the Moore 24 is a far superior boat, but it
was not marketed as well on the J-24.

I agree on the Olson 30. It was an affordable keelboat
whose light weight and white knuckle performance gives
it the edge as a cult boat.

I like the Express 27 also. I haven't sailed either boat, but
I like them both very much. Many people say the Express
27 is a better boat by and large on the wind.

Why did you say Hobie 33. I don't know much about
these boats. Fill us in.

"rgnmstr" wrote

Hobie 33
Olson 30
J24

Bart Senior wrote:
Can you call a mainstream boat like the J-24 a cult boat?

I think the Moore 24 is a far superior boat, but it
was not marketed as well on the J-24.

I agree on the Olson 30. It was an affordable keelboat
whose light weight and white knuckle performance gives
it the edge as a cult boat.

I like the Express 27 also. I haven't sailed either boat, but
I like them both very much. Many people say the Express
27 is a better boat by and large on the wind.

Why did you say Hobie 33. I don't know much about
these boats. Fill us in.

"rgnmstr" wrote


Hobie 33
Olson 30
J24



I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult classic that
it cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass constriction, and cannot be found everywhere. There's a
difference between just being old and popular and being a cult classic.

I would think that being over 20 years would qualify.

"katy" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early fiberglass
constriction, and cannot be found everywhere. There's a difference
between just being old and popular and being a cult classic.

In article , Bart Senior .@. wrote:
I would think that being over 20 years would qualify.

"katy" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early fiberglass
constriction, and cannot be found everywhere. There's a difference
between just being old and popular and being a cult classic.

I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)



--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article , Bart Senior .@. wrote:

I would think that being over 20 years would qualify.

"katy" wrote

I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early fiberglass
constriction, and cannot be found everywhere. There's a difference
between just being old and popular and being a cult classic.


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)



Hey, I resemble that remark!

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?


Scotty

Scotty,

I think those women WOULDN"T.



http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage

http://community.webtv.net/tassail/Pneuma

In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?

Outside wood, pink on the inside, and flexed quite a bit. They also
had some other interesting characteristics. :-)


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
I think that in order for a boat to be labeled a cult
classic that it
cannot be of recent make, must be of either wood or early
fiberglass


I used to know a couple of women who would qualify as cult
classics if
you use Bart's definition. :-)


Were they wood, or fiberglass?

Outside wood,

Didn't you get splinters?