Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
In order for your first point to succeed, you ahve to have your second point in place for development of conscience. When young children are being raised, it is necessary that there be consequences for actions...good and bad. Consequences can be equivocated to punishment at times if the infraction is grave. Fear of negative consequence is a healthy thing. It keeps us from becoming sociopathic. "DSK" wrote in message .. . Whatever slight positive effect on morality religion might have is due to fear of punishment, which IMHO is not really anything to brag about. Scott Vernon wrote: Huh? You must be catholic. Which type of ethical principle is better: 1- To do the right thing(s) because they are right 2- To do the right thing(s), or at least to avoid doing wrong, because one is afraid of being caught & punished ??? I may be kind of old fashioned but it seems to me that 1 is superior. This of course avoids the question of how one determines what is right and wrong, which is a whole 'nuther debate. Churches tend to discourage any attempt to seriously examine either of these questions.... or all questions entirely, which is why the Catholics booted me out ![]() DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Puts Lake Superior to shame | ASA | |||
The Shame of Bush | ASA | |||
OT Beyond shame | General |