![]() |
"DSK" wrote in message . .. katysails wrote: Doug, In order for your first point to succeed, you ahve to have your second point in place for development of conscience. I disagree. I knew you would... ... When young children are being raised, it is necessary that there be consequences for actions...good and bad. Agreed. But that can be reduced to simple behaviorism... mechanistically reinforcing children to act in ways that are "good." And what is it that determines what is "good" vs what is "bad"? Behaviorism can be used to direct any type of behavior pattern to the will of the director if applied correctly...developing conscience adds the element of appropriateness according to a set of moral or ethical values... This is not the same thing as having (and following) a rational moral & ethical code. In order to follow a rational moral or ethical code one must be directed...one must have a formed consciounce...fear of comnsequence is the most advantageous way to learn that... ... Consequences can be equivocated to punishment at times if the infraction is grave. Fear of negative consequence is a healthy thing. It keeps us from becoming sociopathic. The problem with this viewpoint is that it erases the difference between a sociopath who is restrained by fear of punishment, and a person who has no tendency towards sociopathy. A sociopath restrained by fear is still restrained..which is a good thing...a sociopath is typically amoral...there is only what is good or bad for him...a person who is not sociopathic will sift through and determine what is correct and what is incorrect behavior..fear is a great element in that development...a child being told that he will be burned if he plays with the stove usually won't stop playing with the stive until he is burned...the fear of being burned again assists with his then making a better choice in the future... This sort of thinking is like those cops who believe that there's no such thing as an honest citizen. Do you believe this is right & good?!? I find it hard to believe that you do... I believe that people learn to be bad or good and if not presented with the right choices and the right consequences, that they will choose bad. In the long run, it is far easier to be a bad person because the self-gratification is so great. I do believe tha thteir are honest and good people, but that they are honest and good because they have chosen to be that way. DSK |
I disagree.
katysails wrote: I knew you would... Hah! By appearing to be predictable, I lull you into a false sense of security! But seriously, a behavioristic (or mechanistic, as some people think of it) way of instilling "good" behavior works quite well; however I don't think it is in any way related to developing a set of ethical and moral values. It is a good holding action until those values can be developed, though ;) And what is it that determines what is "good" vs what is "bad"? Well, we haven't gotten into that. It's a whole seperate issue for consideration. ... Behaviorism can be used to direct any type of behavior pattern to the will of the director if applied correctly... Bingo. Considering that it's pretty simple, it's surprising that more people can't do it. I have never (and hopefully, will never) raised children, but I have raised a number of dogs, all of whom were well behaved. Our current dog, adopted from the pound as an adult, has been the biggest challenge, and after a few months he's shaping up quite nicely. ...developing conscience adds the element of appropriateness according to a set of moral or ethical values... I'm not sure what you mean by "appropriate." In order to follow a rational moral or ethical code one must be directed...one must have a formed consciounce... I definitely agree. ... fear of comnsequence is the most advantageous way to learn that... I disagree, these are two seperate things entirely. They do have *almost* the same result, however. For example, it is wrong to kill people. It's one of the biggest no-nos in all societies' ethos. However, it is also universally... in all societies, past or present... allowed or even encouraged under very specific circumstances. You can use behaviorism to reinforce the idea 'thou shalt not kill' but this does nothing whatever about those special circumstances. And it's a problem, the military does a fairly directed training towards giving soldiers the emotional capacity to kill, and many (those with social restraint but no conscience, no moral or ethical values ingrained) cause problems later on. Another example is "thou shalt not steal." Is it wrong for a mother to steal bread, so that she can feed her child? Is it wrong for a mayor to award public construction contracts to his brother-in-law? A sociopath restrained by fear is still restrained..which is a good thing...a sociopath is typically amoral...there is only what is good or bad for him... Right. We have a few right here in this newsgroup... I believe that people learn to be bad or good and if not presented with the right choices and the right consequences, that they will choose bad. In the long run, it is far easier to be a bad person because the self-gratification is so great. Not sure if I disagree, but keep in mind that our moral sense is inherited from hundreds of thousands of years of human life in communities. Choosing bad actions has bad results, often for the individual in the long run and almost always for the community in the long and short run. Selfishness is not considered a virtue in any human society that I've heard of. It's my belief, demonstrable in history, that following a good code of morals is the surest path to success in the long run. This applies to the individual and the community... and "community" can (perhaps *must*) be expanded to include most of mankind. This is one reason why I have a big problem with our current political set-up. ... I do believe tha thteir are honest and good people, but that they are honest and good because they have chosen to be that way. Following from your earlier statements, it would seem that good & honest people are that way because their mothers hammered it into them. And that, I agree with! Regards Doug King |
"DSK" wrote I have never (and hopefully, will never) raised children, but I have raised a number of dogs, all of whom were well behaved. Pretty much the same thing, only you need a bigger choker chain. Scotty |
OK CM,
Talk is Cheap! Time to put up! Put up or renege! The US, Australia, and Japan have been on sight, getting supplies to the needy victims. Finally after some 12 days the UN is going to join in. Annan has made mention of Nations living up to their Pledges |
Canada has already deployed DART and supplies last week.
We're at 65 million federal plus the Provincial donations and climbing ..... The USA is no where near the top of the list of donor countries as you would have had us believe Thom. CM "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... OK CM, Talk is Cheap! Time to put up! Put up or renege! The US, Australia, and Japan have been on sight, getting supplies to the needy victims. Finally after some 12 days the UN is going to join in. Annan has made mention of Nations living up to their Pledges |
|
wrote in message http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...homework_abuse That boy is a whining lil' pussy! He'll grow up to be a homo!! **** sake Man.... my old man laid me out with a brick at twenty paces when I didn't stop running away..... he dropped me like a headshot moose! Tell you what... next time he said "Boy Come Here!"... I didn't even think of running! No sweat... I love my Dad.... I look after him now and we have a great time. You Yankees sound like a bunch of pussys to me! CM |
Brick head numbskull. Bwahahahahah.
dropped like a Head shot mouse. Most us rebels are smart enough to duck when Dads throwing bricks, you just had to keep on your toes when he had a pair of channel locks, or was playing with the cattle prod. Another of his favorates was to grab you and then he would grab the electric fence. Oh for the good ol days Joe |
"Joe" wrote in message Most us rebels are smart enough to duck when Dads throwing bricks, you just had to keep on your toes when he had a pair of channel locks, or was playing with the cattle prod. My old man was a pretty good shot.... he clipped my younger brother on a full run with the lid of a tin garbage can. When I was 10 and argueing that I "needed" a certain fishing rod.... he explained the difference between "need" & "want" by holding my nose and mouth closed so I couldn't breathe... as I was turning blue he calmly explained that while I "needed" air to breathe.... I only "wanted" the fishing rod! That got the point across in a hurry! I remember lipping off my Mom just once..... the next thing I knew I was cartwheeling across the kitchen and when I came to a stop in the pantry his finger was pointed at my face and demanding I apologise.... I was grounded for a week with extra homework. Another of his favorates was to grab you and then he would grab the electric fence. Aw hell we used to con the city boys to **** on the electric fence! Oh for the good ol days They raise wimps today...... and blame the parents for problem kids while not allowing them to disipline their children. CM |
CM,
Fear & Greed are very effective motivation devices but they don't always produce the proper results. This thread demonstrates that.. The "Red cent" mentality hasn't helped a needy cause. The critics have belabored the group that is delivering the most but has let the Greedy Islamic wealthy alone. They are the the slowest to help their own people.Why haven't the US haters noticed this lack of giving from the Moslem World? The US has 39 fixed wing planes and fifty Helo's on sight and busy getting supplies into the hands of the needy. Without the US, Japan and Australia there wouldn't be an Aid Program. I just hope that putting them under the UN doesn't let the worlds Greedy screw up their effort. Ole Thom |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com