| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How about relevant to the established datum... at the time that data was
collected.... and the accuracy of the equipment utilized to derive it. BTW - Lots of people disagree with me.... none that count though. CM "Bob Crantz" wrote in message k.net... http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/dec-2004/29/index2.php Two USGS PhD's seem to disagree with you. Remember, movement is relative - relative to what? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Did Australia move ? | ASA | |||
| NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA CREW AVAILABLE NOW | Crew | |||
| Want to go to Australia - Be Gay! | ASA | |||
| Britain, Australia top U.S. in violent crime | ASA | |||
| New sea creatures near Australia | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
