Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told
him about....

CM

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Did he fix the red-eye this time?

Scotty

"Overproof" wrote in message
news:HjCvd.77059$6f6.5340@edtnps89...
Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional!

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Here ya go....

Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW
downconverted.

http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg.

I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a
thing as too
sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made
for a
stunning 8X10 borderless print.

Capt RB

Overproof wrote:
Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I
told him about....

Photoshop?
('


CM

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Did he fix the red-eye this time?

Scotty

"Overproof" wrote in message
news:HjCvd.77059$6f6.5340@edtnps89...
Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional!

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Here ya go....

Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW
downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg.

I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a
thing as too
sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made
for a
stunning 8X10 borderless print.

Capt RB

"Bell" wrote in message
...
Overproof wrote:
Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I
told him about....

Photoshop?
('

Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette
let alone pixel edit and masks.

I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the shots
for him.... ;-D

CM

Overproof wrote:
"Bell" wrote in message
...
Overproof wrote:
Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I
told him about....

Photoshop?
('

Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a
palette let alone pixel edit and masks.

I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the
shots for him.... ;-D

CM

Photoshop (you *know* bs has to have the most expensive) has an auto
"red-eye remover". Just point and click.

Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him?

"Bell" wrote in message
...
Overproof wrote:
"Bell" wrote in message
...
Overproof wrote:
Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I
told him about....

Photoshop?
('

Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a
palette let alone pixel edit and masks.

I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the
shots for him.... ;-D

CM

Photoshop (you *know* bs has to have the most expensive) has an auto
"red-eye remover". Just point and click.

Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him?


They generally give you a free copy w/purchase of camera, part of the
software bundle.

John Cairns

John Cairns wrote:
"Bell" wrote in message
...
Overproof wrote:
"Bell" wrote in message
...
Overproof wrote:
Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the
technique I told him about....

Photoshop?
('

Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a
palette let alone pixel edit and masks.

I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the
shots for him.... ;-D

CM

Photoshop (you *know* bs has to have the most expensive) has an auto
"red-eye remover". Just point and click.

Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him?


They generally give you a free copy w/purchase of camera, part of the
software bundle.

John Cairns

FREE??

Not for the BS! He'd never do FREE. Maybe he suckered someone out of it
(or got it in their will?)

Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette
let alone pixel edit and masks.

I use Photoshop CS (full version) of course along with Nikon-View to decode raw
images. Neat Image is used to correct higher ISOs.
Mooron blows it again!

RB

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette
let alone pixel edit and masks.

I use Photoshop CS (full version) of course along with Nikon-View to
decode raw
images. Neat Image is used to correct higher ISOs.
Mooron blows it again!

Bwahhahahahahahahaaaa.... what a dolt!

Photoshop ...full version... Bwahahahahahahahahahaaaa

You really don't have a clue do you Bob!??

Here's a hint... if you had the full version... why would yu use
Nikon-View???

Because your an IDIOT! .... and you don't have the full version... you
couldn't work the full version... you wouldn't understand the full
version....

CM

Here's a hint... if you had the full version... why would yu use
Nikon-View???


Mooron, I feel bad for you. At each turn you get exposed.
Here's a newsflash. Photoshop CS, PSLE and Elements 3.0 CAN'T READ the NIKON
NEF RAW files without the plugin that downloads with NIKON VIEW. Period.

SLABAMMMMMMM!!! BWAHAHAHAHA! CRUNCH!!!!! OH, THE HUMANITY!!!!

RB

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Here's a hint... if you had the full version... why would yu use
Nikon-View???


Mooron, I feel bad for you. At each turn you get exposed.
Here's a newsflash. Photoshop CS, PSLE and Elements 3.0 CAN'T READ the
NIKON
NEF RAW files without the plugin that downloads with NIKON VIEW. Period.

SLABAMMMMMMM!!! BWAHAHAHAHA! CRUNCH!!!!! OH, THE HUMANITY!!!!

Relax Bob... you'll strain an artery... I said why would you use Nikon
View if you had a full blown version of Photoshop? I said nothing regarding
a requirement for a plug-in available on the Nikon Software..... and the
internet.

CM