(Bobsprit) wrote in message ...
Watermaker?

Not yet. Will get one before heading out into the Pacific.


Read NEVER.


Why?

Joe

RB

it's just too scary for boob**** to even think about.


"Joe" wrote in message
om...
(Bobsprit) wrote in message
...
Watermaker?

Not yet. Will get one before heading out into the Pacific.


Read NEVER.


Why?

Joe

RB

"Joe" wrote in message
om...
(Bobsprit) wrote in message
...
Watermaker?

Not yet. Will get one before heading out into the Pacific.


Read NEVER.


Why?

Joe

RB

Probably because Bob hasn't done any blue-water sailing in the Atlantic,
even though he's had ample opportunity to do so over the years, by his own
reckoning.
John Cairns

"John Cairns" wrote i

Probably because Bob hasn't done any blue-water sailing in the
Atlantic,
even though he's had ample opportunity to do so over the years, by
his own
reckoning.


But he did the round Long Island race. At least he bragged that he
was going to do it.

he did it, right?

SV

"John Cairns" wrote

Probably because Bob hasn't done any blue-water sailing in the
Atlantic,
even though he's had ample opportunity to do so over the years, by
his own
reckoning.

What about his famous 'sail to nowhere'? I remember him bragging
about that even before he did it.

When *did* he do that, anyway?

Scotty

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"John Cairns" wrote

Probably because Bob hasn't done any blue-water sailing in the
Atlantic,
even though he's had ample opportunity to do so over the years, by
his own
reckoning.

What about his famous 'sail to nowhere'? I remember him bragging
about that even before he did it.

When *did* he do that, anyway?

Scotty

Don't really know much about Bob's sailing "history". I do recall him
bragging about not being a "9 to 5'er" on more than one occasion. My
thoughts have always been, if you have the time and are in a geographic
location to do a blue-water cruise, why not? I guess Joe hasn't been here
long enough to remember those posts. I suspect that Bobs done a lot less
sailing than he claimed he would.
John Cairns

My
thoughts have always been, if you have the time and are in a geographic
location to do a blue-water cruise, why not?


So, John, are we to understand that you agree with Joe's post about no boat
under 200 feet ever needing a bow thruster? Or do you agree with me that in
some cases it's needed based on the vessel and docking situation?

RB

Way to change the subject BB.


"Bob**** the big fat LOSER" wrote ...
My
thoughts have always been, if you have the time and are in a
geographic
location to do a blue-water cruise, why not?


So, John, are we to understand that you agree with Joe's post about
no boat
under 200 feet ever needing a bow thruster? Or do you agree with me
that in
some cases it's needed based on the vessel and docking situation?

BoB

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
My
thoughts have always been, if you have the time and are in a geographic
location to do a blue-water cruise, why not?


So, John, are we to understand that you agree with Joe's post about no
boat
under 200 feet ever needing a bow thruster? Or do you agree with me that
in
some cases it's needed based on the vessel and docking situation?

RB

WTF?
John Cairns

some cases it's needed based on the vessel and docking situation?

RB

WTF?


Exactly.

RB