In article k.net,
Maxprop wrote:
For socialists like Oz, Ganz, and BBtheS only someone akin to Fidel Castro
or Leonid Brezhnev will do. For the rest of the democrat party, they would
be well-advised to seek a more centrist point of view, as you suggest. I
suspect yesterday's vote was, to some degree, a referrendum on this. Most
democrats aren't the rabid leftists that a few in this NG seem to be.

You're really an idiot. Castro and Brezhnev are COMMUNISTS not
socialists. Sweden is pretty close to Russia. Maybe you were thinking
of them.

I feel left out, having been omitted from the either list. I've been rather
abrasive today in my posts. Perhaps I'll make one or the other list after
all.

You've always been on the loser list. No need to be repetitive.
--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message


You're really an idiot. Castro and Brezhnev are COMMUNISTS not
socialists. Sweden is pretty close to Russia. Maybe you were thinking
of them.

Why don't you learn something, Jon. You really make an ass of yourself,
putting your ignorance on display. Socialism and communism aren't mutually
exclusive. True communism probably never existed in any viable form in the
past several centuries, beyond the communes in the US in the Sixties and
Seventies. Both the USSR, which, incidentally means Union of the Soviet
*Socialist* Republics, and Cuba were/are socialist countries. That the US
calls them "communist" countries means little.


You've always been on the loser list. No need to be repetitive.

Hmm. Lessee--the man I voted for won. Yours didn't.

I believe you've got that backward.

Max