| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Horvath" wrote in message ... On 28 Oct 2004 16:00:03 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote this crap: Thanks for clarifying. So, in simpler language, what you're saying is that you support the notion that women should be subject to the whim of state legislators, similar to how blacks were treated by those very same legislators. Basically, they shouldn't have the right to choose under federal law. About time you started making some sense, Jon-boy. Maybe someday you'll finally become a man. He's saving up for the operation. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
... "Horvath" wrote in message ... On 28 Oct 2004 16:00:03 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote this crap: Thanks for clarifying. So, in simpler language, what you're saying is that you support the notion that women should be subject to the whim of state legislators, similar to how blacks were treated by those very same legislators. Basically, they shouldn't have the right to choose under federal law. About time you started making some sense, Jon-boy. Maybe someday you'll finally become a man. I'm saving up for the operation. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Horvath" wrote in message
... On 28 Oct 2004 16:00:03 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote this crap: Thanks for clarifying. So, in simpler language, what you're saying is that you support the notion that women should be subject to the whim of state legislators, similar to how blacks were treated by those very same legislators. Basically, they shouldn't have the right to choose under federal law. About time you started making some sense, Jon-boy. Maybe someday I'll finally become a man. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
