On 25 Oct 2004 11:04:46 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Actually, you're the one who looks stupid..

It goes much deeper than "looks".


I mean, seriously!!! Can Loco or Horvath be any dumber?
The president of the USA starts a war based on weapons that don't exist and
these morons don't even SUSPECT that they might have been lied to? They don't
second guess it? No bells go off, no lights come on? Anyone with half a brain
would be very uncertain, but not Loco! Not Horvath!


Kerry said he would have done the same thing.




Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
The president of the USA starts a war based on weapons that don't exist and
these morons don't even SUSPECT that they might have been lied to? They don't
second guess it? No bells go off, no lights come on? Anyone with half a brain
would be very uncertain, but not Loco! Not Horvath!


Kerry said he would have done the same thing.

Except that BushCo apparently used uncorroborated intelligence
information. For example, Powell quoted British Intelligence during
his UN testimony, but it turns out the original report was written by
a grad student in Monterey. BushCo LIED.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

On 26 Oct 2004 17:06:45 -0700, (Jonathan
Ganz) wrote this crap:

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
The president of the USA starts a war based on weapons that don't exist and
these morons don't even SUSPECT that they might have been lied to? They don't
second guess it? No bells go off, no lights come on? Anyone with half a brain
would be very uncertain, but not Loco! Not Horvath!


Kerry said he would have done the same thing.

Except that BushCo apparently used uncorroborated intelligence
information. For example, Powell quoted British Intelligence during
his UN testimony, but it turns out the original report was written by
a grad student in Monterey.

Is that the same intelligence that Clinton and Kerry had?






Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

OzOne wrote in message

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:58:32 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:

That is perhaps one of the greatest reasons why Bush would be a far
superior
CiC compared with Kerry, who has been uniformly disrespectful of other
servicemen, virtually from the time he set foot back in the US after his
"tour of duty" in Vietnam.

Max

No Max, he was critical of a Govt that placed it's military in a
situation where they were ordered to use methods that guaranteed
extremely high civilian casualties and praised those who killed the
most.

Wrong. He impugned the troops for purported atrocities (Winter Soldier),
some of which were accurate, many of which weren't. You are correct in that
he maligned the military hierarchy and the government for the methods you
describe, but he also maligned the troops themselves, and that is not
something one who wishes to be CiC should ever do.

Question: what percentage of the personnel in the US military will respect
Commander in Chief Kerry? Clinton was despised by over 90% of them; Kerry
will be equally despised, or moreso.

Max

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

He can't because there's nothing to attack. His attack dogs do it for him.

Do you mean that 527 group Bush said should be outlawed?

Max

"Vito" wrote in message

Gee Max, glad you finally woke up! I don't know a soul who actually LIKES
Kerry but enough of us are sick enough of Bush to elect Kerry despite
that.

Thank God the Grand Klaxon of the KKK isn't running against Bush.


I wish the Democrats had put up almost anybody except Kerry but that's
immaterial. If we care for America, we gotta get rid of Bush before he
destroys her!

Right. Let Kerry do it for ya.

Max

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
Is that the same intelligence that Clinton and Kerry had?

No. It's the same intelligence that you lack.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article . net,
Maxprop wrote:
Wrong. He impugned the troops for purported atrocities (Winter Soldier),
some of which were accurate, many of which weren't. You are correct in that
he maligned the military hierarchy and the government for the methods you
describe, but he also maligned the troops themselves, and that is not
something one who wishes to be CiC should ever do.

He repeated what he had been told. No, he didn't malign the troops.

Question: what percentage of the personnel in the US military will respect
Commander in Chief Kerry? Clinton was despised by over 90% of them; Kerry
will be equally despised, or moreso.

Clinton was not dispised by 90% or anything close to that. That's pure
RNC bull****.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article .net,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

He can't because there's nothing to attack. His attack dogs do it for him.

Do you mean that 527 group Bush said should be outlawed?

The Swift Boat Liars for one, yes. Who's main spokesman is a shill for
Karl (Achtung) Rove.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."