"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:58:19 -0400, "Claxton"
wrote
this crap:

Thanks. Good corrections. You're right about all of them. We are
pretty
new to the whole sailing thing, and without looking it all up I
wanted to
respond to Horvath's brilliant answer to what kind of boat was in
the movie
(a sailboat--duh! followed by the "probably a sloop" thing that
exposed even
more ignorance than we have about sailboats). The good thing about
ignorance is that it can be corrected with study. Stupidity lasts
a
lifetime.

You didn't say which boat.

BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.

Riiiight, so I guess the boat in Titanic was "probably a sloop"?

SV

BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.


Scott Vernon wrote:
Riiiight, so I guess the boat in Titanic was "probably a sloop"?

You could say that, in the same way that "Horvath is probably a mammal."

Actually, the Titanic was a schooner.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.


Scott Vernon wrote:
Riiiight, so I guess the boat in Titanic was "probably a sloop"?

You could say that, in the same way that "Horvath is probably a
mammal."

Actually, the Titanic was a schooner.



It was a ketchy looking boat, y'awl.

Scotty

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:58:19 -0400, "Claxton" wrote
this crap:

Thanks. Good corrections. You're right about all of them. We are pretty
new to the whole sailing thing, and without looking it all up I wanted to
respond to Horvath's brilliant answer to what kind of boat was in the movie
(a sailboat--duh! followed by the "probably a sloop" thing that exposed even
more ignorance than we have about sailboats). The good thing about
ignorance is that it can be corrected with study. Stupidity lasts a
lifetime.

You didn't say which boat.

BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.

And for being an idiot.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:39:04 -0400, "Scott Vernon"
wrote this crap:


a
lifetime.

You didn't say which boat.

BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.

Riiiight, so I guess the boat in Titanic was "probably a sloop"?

Which boat?





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

"Horvath" wrote in message

BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.

Riiiight, so I guess the boat in Titanic was "probably a sloop"?

Which boat?

the one with the backwards steering wheel.

Scotty

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:39:04 -0400, "Scott Vernon"
wrote this crap:


a
lifetime.

You didn't say which boat.

BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.

Riiiight, so I guess the boat in Titanic was "probably a sloop"?

Which boat?


It was your hunter. It sank.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

What a gaff....
"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
BTW, I thought I did pretty good for never seeing the movie.


Scott Vernon wrote:
Riiiight, so I guess the boat in Titanic was "probably a sloop"?

You could say that, in the same way that "Horvath is probably a
mammal."

Actually, the Titanic was a schooner.



It was a ketchy looking boat, y'awl.

Scotty

Watch it or we'll throw you in the brig in 10.

In article ,
katysails wrote:
What a gaff....


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

Doubt it.....ketch ya later....
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Watch it or we'll throw you in the brig in 10.

In article ,
katysails wrote:
What a gaff....


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."