Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sailing a C&C32 is not a "sea trial".
http://www.schulzsurveyors.com/sea.htm If you're going to play the expert, you need to UNDERSTAND the terminology. There is only one kind of "sea trial", it involves sailing and inspecting the boat you intend to purchase, not the same model. While sailing the vessel one plans to buy is best, sailing a sistership is a reasonable alternative. Let's look at why this is so. The main reasons for a sea trial are to judge sailing characteristics and test a vessel for obvious problems. In an era of production boats built by major builders, boats of the same design generally exhibit identical sailing charateristics. This is the essence of one design building. So sailing a sistership(s) will generally bear out sailing characteristics. In the case of Alien, her history was known to me and she was thoroughly gone over. In the end I had some idea of how she would sail and had no concerns regarding condition. For all intents and purposes I had a sea trial. Clearly this is not the case with boats built one off and I would want a sea trial of certain makes, such as Cheoy Lee, irrespective of a detailed survey. RB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even the most cared for boat can have a flaw you will not find unless
you put her thru the paces. But if you can't put her through her paces, then sailing a sistership is a good idea followed by a very careful survey. Joe, you made NO points. I did everything correctly and my boat, which has NO problems proves it. You can cry and troll like an ass, but you'll still be wrong. Here's the proof and the pudding.... http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/al4.jpg Dry boat, bone dry decks and no engine or electrical problems after two seasons. You can argue with success, Joe, but you'll just keep losing! RB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
a vessel for obvious problems.
Yes and you will never find odvious problems on a sistership dummy. What an idiot. Obvious problems will be found if you have a clue about boats, which you clearly don't! RB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the essence of one design building. So sailing a
sistership(s) will generally bear out sailing characteristics. Halfwit Joe, please explain how MY C&C 32, (following a proper survey) might still have exhibited dissapointing sailing characteristics as compared to the two other C&C 32s I'd sailed. Having sailed aboard 4 of them now, I'm really curious to hear this one! RB |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alien, her history was known to me and she was thoroughly gone over. In the
end Not if you did not do a sea trial. How did you stress her on the blocks? Stress test her how and where, dumbass? On the LIS? What a dope! RB |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nutsy,
Where did you find a sister ship with the Step Ladder on the Stern? OT |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nutsy,
Where did you find a sister ship with the Step Ladder on the Stern? Good point! My boat also has better gear than the others. I wonder how much performance difference all of my self tailing winches make... RB |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sailing a similar boat is not a Sea Trial, it's a test drive.
Still more than Scotty did. And Mooron and Scotty are still advocating buying a designs who's sailing properties are unknown. RB |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
More lies from the ****Head.
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Sailing a similar boat is not a Sea Trial, it's a test drive. Still more than Scotty did. And Mooron and Scotty are still advocating buying a designs who's sailing properties are unknown. RB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who usually pays to put boat in water for trial - buyer or seller? | General | |||
OT BushCo lies about John Edwards | General | |||
Cripes...a "show trial" for Saddam? | General | |||
sea trial of Cal 28 today | ASA |