Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't think oil supplies are infinite at all. I merely think that we'll use something else when it becomes important to do so. Fuel cells for one example. Notice how wireless comms is making copper based phone systems less important? We used to wonder how the 3rd World could build a comms infrastructure. Simple now. Point is that doomsayers like you always cry like Chicken Little but the date is always some time in the future. When that date comes around, quiet reigns - and another prediction is made for some future time. Frankly your record sucks. PDW In article , thunder wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:48:57 +1000, Peter Wiley wrote: Ya know, I have 20 years of Mother Earth News magazines. The 'experts' used to say exactly the same thing. Back in the 1970's. And that makes them wrong? Hubbert predicted, in 1956, that US production would peak in 1970. He was scoffed at then, but looking back, that is when US oil production peaked. Since 1984, new oil discoveries have failed to replace oil production. Demand is constantly increasing, especially in Third World countries such as China and India. And, this country still does not have a comprehensive energy policy. You may think oil supplies are infinite, but they are not. Peak oil will be sooner, not later. |