Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
... Jeff Morris wrote: Be a bit careful comparing numbers - some are "working load" and others are "breaking strength." I think for chain and shackles "working load" is define as 25% of breaking strength. Also, you want to consider the failure mode - a quick link can deform making it hard to take apart. I was aware and considered working load, not breaking strength, your 4 to 1 figure is the one usually used for chain and chain fittings. I was pretty sure you understood, but when I looked in the Boat/US catalog they actually listed the breaking strength for their quicklinks, and they seemed weaker than shackles. One must be explicit for the benefit of the thousands of lurkers who rely on our collective wisdom! BTW, Earl Hinz ("Complete Book of Anchoring and Mooring") is explicit that quicklinks are for temporary use only, though he doesn't elaborate. BTW, why not use a swivel to connect to the anchor? Maybe your Danforth won't pull out as much if it had a swivel. Can't see how that would help. Joking a bit, but I've heard it claimed that without swivel there's a chance that an anchor would be pulled out due to twisted chain. Certainly, if you anchor for long periods where you could spin around the anchor you should have a swivel. If you use one, it should be attached to the anchor through a shackle, not directly, since a direct connection would have a heavy side load as the boat sheers. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Quick Outdrive question | General | |||
Smart Tabs, quick report | General | |||
FS: Link 20 in Box | Marketplace | |||
FS: Link 20 new in box | Marketplace | |||
$#%~#^%@ Halyard piston Shackle Lanyard! | Cruising |