No Longer a Beginner!
Last Friday we took out boat out in 13-20 mph winds with white caps and sailed
it perfectly and with much fun. We especially liked sailing close hauled with spray and water splashing on us. We have a Hunter 146, and I think it's safe to say, we were pushing it to its limits. We had the main reefed but with full jib. I really don't think I want to go out in heavier winds. But we are certainly no longer beginners at sailing. The problem now is that we are spoiled. We refuse to go sailing if the wind is 9 mph. I'd go out in maybe winds gusting to 25 mph, but beyond that, I'm sure I'd start breaking rigging. |
No Longer a Beginner!
We had the main reefed but with full
jib. Try a smaller headsail. RB |
No Longer a Beginner!
EdGordonRN wrote:
Last Friday we took out boat out in 13-20 mph winds with white caps and sailed it perfectly and with much fun. "perfectly"?? Sorry, nobody including Paul Elvstrom and Buddy Melges sails perfectly. But I'm glad you're having a lot of fun, that's what it should be like. ... We especially liked sailing close hauled with spray and water splashing on us. We have a Hunter 146, and I think it's safe to say, we were pushing it to its limits. We had the main reefed but with full jib. ?? Never seen reef points on a Hunter 146 (or any other boat that size). .... I really don't think I want to go out in heavier winds. But we are certainly no longer beginners at sailing. The problem now is that we are spoiled. We refuse to go sailing if the wind is 9 mph. I'd go out in maybe winds gusting to 25 mph, but beyond that, I'm sure I'd start breaking rigging. Probably not. Unless you've mistreated it somehow, the rigging on that boat should not break in the strongest winds you can keep it right-side up. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote:
EdGordonRN wrote: We have a Hunter 146, and I think it's safe to say, we were pushing it to its limits. We had the main reefed but with full jib. ?? Never seen reef points on a Hunter 146 (or any other boat that size). It's not the norm, but it's not unheard of. For instance, CL boatworks offers mainsail reef points for the CL-14 and CL-16 as a factory option. Cost about $100 CDN. .... I really don't think I want to go out in heavier winds. But we are certainly no longer beginners at sailing. The problem now is that we are spoiled. We refuse to go sailing if the wind is 9 mph. I'd go out in maybe winds gusting to 25 mph, but beyond that, I'm sure I'd start breaking rigging. Probably not. Unless you've mistreated it somehow, the rigging on that boat should not break in the strongest winds you can keep it right-side up. Well, the shrouds and forestay should hold (i.e. the mast shouldn't come down) but everything else that can shake loose may well shake loose: shackles, cleats, pintles, etc. When it's blowing the dog off the chain, you'd better double check the mechanical integrity of *everything* before going out (including yourself!). -- //-Walt // // Sigs suck. Oh, the irony. |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote:
?? Never seen reef points on a Hunter 146 (or any other boat that size). Walt wrote: It's not the norm, but it's not unheard of. For instance, CL boatworks offers mainsail reef points for the CL-14 and CL-16 as a factory option. Cost about $100 CDN. OK, but is it an option on a Hunter 146? I'd be suspicious that the reefed sail shape might not be good, and that it may well put odd stresses on the rig & spars. I have seen some reefs put on daysailers in the 17' ~ 20' size range, and most often it resulted in a boat that didn't sail any better than if it was lugging the whole sail. Not to say that it couldn't be done, but to design the rig from scratch for reefing capability would probably be a big performance hit for normal sailing. Well, the shrouds and forestay should hold (i.e. the mast shouldn't come down) but everything else that can shake loose may well shake loose: shackles, cleats, pintles, etc. When it's blowing the dog off the chain, you'd better double check the mechanical integrity of *everything* before going out (including yourself!). True. Glad you put pintles on the list, these (and other rudder fittings) can break in heavy air if either mistreated, neglected, or poorly designed & built from scratch. BTW I consider failing to do simple routine maintenance on the rig, like checking & taping pins & shackles, a form of mistreatment. It's not rocket science and it ought to be obvious to anybody who knows the rudiments of sailing. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote:
DSK wrote: ?? Never seen reef points on a Hunter 146 (or any other boat that size). Walt wrote: It's not the norm, but it's not unheard of. For instance, CL boatworks offers mainsail reef points for the CL-14 and CL-16 as a factory option. Cost about $100 CDN. OK, but is it an option on a Hunter Not that i'm aware of, but I'm sure you could have any loft install some reef points for you. It's not like it takes an advanced degree in aerodynamics or marine architecture to install some grommets and reef lines. 146? I'd be suspicious that the reefed sail shape might not be good, and that it may well put odd stresses on the rig & spars. You're suspicions are probably right, but while the sail shape may be suboptimal and the stresses may be odd, I'd guss that just installing some reef points to make take the bottom 18" out of the equation would be close enough for most people. I have seen some reefs put on daysailers in the 17' ~ 20' size range, and most often it resulted in a boat that didn't sail any better than if it was lugging the whole sail. I consider "upright" to be sailing better than "not upright" . If it accomplishes that, it's done the job. Not to say that it couldn't be done, but to design the rig from scratch for reefing capability would probably be a big performance hit for normal sailing. What boat were we talking about again? -- //-Walt // // http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif |
No Longer a Beginner!
Walt wrote:
Not that i'm aware of, but I'm sure you could have any loft install some reef points for you. It's not like it takes an advanced degree in aerodynamics or marine architecture to install some grommets and reef lines. Good point. The problem is that sail shape and relative foil area become a lot more important, and produce more dramatic effects, as the wind increases. This is why Navvie was so sure that *no* dinghy could be sailed in 30+ knot winds. A mom-and-pop reefing system may hack down the sail area, and can even produce a not-horrible sail shape, but it's not going to address any of the other issues and may only give a small increase in sailable wind range. But hey, why am I being so picky? An increase in sailable wind range is good! .... I'd be suspicious that the reefed sail shape might not be good, and that it may well put odd stresses on the rig & spars. You're suspicions are probably right, but while the sail shape may be suboptimal and the stresses may be odd, I'd guss that just installing some reef points to make take the bottom 18" out of the equation would be close enough for most people. Until you break the boom or the gooseneck or the rudder or something, while out sailing in wind & wave conditions that make recovery a problem. Then your insurance company might ask some embarrassing questions about why you have reef points, and all the other XYZ 15s they insure do not... I consider "upright" to be sailing better than "not upright" . If it accomplishes that, it's done the job. Agreed. But one can accomplish that in all sorts of ways, among which is by learning to handle the boat properly. Learning how to depower a rig can be as important and useful a skill as learning how to get max power. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote:
Walt wrote: I'd guss that just installing some reef points to make take the bottom 18" out of the equation would be close enough for most people. Until you break the boom or the gooseneck or the rudder or something, while out sailing in wind & wave conditions that make recovery a problem. Maybe I'm somewhat lacking in immagination, but I don't see how a homebrew reefing system could cause the boom to break. If the odd sailplan generates odd forces, my hunch is that they'd manifest themselves as a boat that's difficult to control long before being large enough to break things, although the wrong sail plan could cause enough lee helm to over-stress the rudder. Then your insurance company might ask some embarrassing questions about why you have reef points, and all the other XYZ 15s they insure do not... More likely they're going to ask why you were out in those conditions when all the other XYZ 15s had gone in. Anyway I self-insure except for liability, so I doubt I'd ever be having such a conversation. Actually this whole thread is strictly armchair speculation for me - I'm not planning on installing reef points any time in the forseeable future. I consider "upright" to be sailing better than "not upright" . If it accomplishes that, it's done the job. Learning how to depower a rig can be as important and useful a skill as learning how to get max power. Absolutely. Once the wind gets above a certain point anybody can get all the power they can handle out of the rig. The trick is to only generate as much as you can handle. -- //-Walt // // http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/040514/matson.gif |
No Longer a Beginner!
Walt wrote:
Maybe I'm somewhat lacking in immagination, but I don't see how a homebrew reefing system could cause the boom to break. It's not imagination, you're just not paranoid enough ;) But (slightly) more seriously, the reefing line is going to simultaneously put a lot of compresson & some bending moment on the boom. Combine that with the vang and/or mid-boom sheeting, weakness in the boom introduced by drilling holes t mount the reefing gear, and Presto! But i may be scratching pretty hard to find trouble here. ... If the odd sailplan generates odd forces, my hunch is that they'd manifest themselves as a boat that's difficult to control long before being large enough to break things, although the wrong sail plan could cause enough lee helm to over-stress the rudder. Agreed. Shucks, some boats are hard to control under optimal circumstances. Then your insurance company might ask some embarrassing questions about why you have reef points, and all the other XYZ 15s they insure do not... More likely they're going to ask why you were out in those conditions when all the other XYZ 15s had gone in. OK I withdraw that point of debate. Insurance isn't going to be a major issue for small boats anyway (or at least, it shouldn't be). Learning how to depower a rig can be as important and useful a skill as learning how to get max power. Absolutely. Once the wind gets above a certain point anybody can get all the power they can handle out of the rig. The trick is to only generate as much as you can handle. It might be more sensible to get a heavy-air mainsail made, flatter with no roach & no battens, possibly a shorter luff; instead of installing reef points. After all this, I'm beginning to suspect that the original post was a troll anyway. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
No Longer a Beginner!
EdGordonRN wrote: Last Friday we took out boat out in 13-20 mph winds with white caps and sailed it perfectly and with much fun. We especially liked sailing close hauled with spray and water splashing on us. We have a Hunter 146, and I think it's safe to say, we were pushing it to its limits. Are you serious? Cheers |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote: This is why Navvie was so sure that *no* dinghy could be sailed in 30+ knot winds. Unmanageable does not mean can't be sailed. Look it up. Cheers |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote:
This is why Navvie was so sure that *no* dinghy could be sailed in 30+ knot winds. Navigator wrote: Unmanageable does not mean can't be sailed. Look it up. Look it up where? Are you suggesting that a boat which is "unmanageable" is still being properly & safely sailed? But other than that, you're right. I apologize, the two terms should be kept seperate. DSK |
No Longer a Beginner!
"Walt" wrote in message
... Maybe I'm somewhat lacking in immagination, but I don't see how a homebrew reefing system could cause the boom to break. If the odd sailplan generates odd forces, my hunch is that they'd manifest themselves as a boat that's difficult to control long before being large enough to break things, although the wrong sail plan could cause enough lee helm to over-stress the rudder. My experience with small boats is that most damage is caused by being out of control, not simply from overstressing gear. Capsizing, and righting a boat, is extremely hard on the gear, as is dipping a tightly vanged boom. etc. |
No Longer a Beginner!
"Wally" wrote in message
... DSK wrote: After all this, I'm beginning to suspect that the original post was a troll anyway. The use of mph for wind speeds does seem a tad Jimspritish... No, Ed already told us that the Weather Channel is what he relies on for forecasts. |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote:
After all this, I'm beginning to suspect that the original post was a troll anyway. The use of mph for wind speeds does seem a tad Jimspritish... -- Wally www.forthsailing.com www.wally.myby.co.uk |
No Longer a Beginner!
"perfectly"?? Sorry, nobody including Paul Elvstrom and Buddy Melges
sails perfectly. But I'm glad you're having a lot of fun, that's what it should be like. Well, true. But we didn't capsize. ?? Never seen reef points on a Hunter 146 (or any other boat that size). Yeah, our main sail has them, one set anyway. So did our apollo when we had that one, and it was 16 ft. Probably not. Unless you've mistreated it somehow, the rigging on that boat should not break in the strongest winds you can keep it right-side up. I hope you're right. But the boat doesn't come with hiking straps, and I put them in. Still, you're probably right. 10 mph more and we wouldn't have kept it upright on tacks and yet I don't think the rigging would have broke. |
No Longer a Beginner!
Well, the shrouds and forestay should hold (i.e. the mast shouldn't come
down) but everything else that can shake loose may well shake loose: shackles, cleats, pintles, etc. That's exactly what I meant. I began to worry a little about the cam cleats for the jib. |
No Longer a Beginner!
Are you serious?
Cheers Maybe we were pushing ourselves to our limits. And, yes, I use mph. I never got the feeling for knots. I only convert to knots when I look up the wind force on the scale in my sailing book. I and my wife are totally self-taught as a sailors, and we're proud of that fact. |
No Longer a Beginner!
EdGordonRN wrote:
And, yes, I use mph. I never got the feeling for knots. How did you get a feeling for wind speed in mph? -- Wally www.forthsailing.com www.wally.myby.co.uk |
No Longer a Beginner!
DSK wrote: DSK wrote: This is why Navvie was so sure that *no* dinghy could be sailed in 30+ knot winds. Navigator wrote: Unmanageable does not mean can't be sailed. Look it up. Look it up where? OED: Incapable of being properly or conveniently handled or manipulated. 1658 PHILLIPS, Immanity,..such a hugenesse as renders a thing unmanageable. 1779 Phil. Trans. LXIX. 422 It required an index of an unmanageable length. 1805 in Nicolas Disp. Nelson (1846) VII. 166 So that the Ship was entirely unmanageable. Note the last example... But other than that, you're right. I apologize, the two terms should be kept seperate. A maybe subtle difference but important I feel. Cheers |
No Longer a Beginner!
Wally wrote: EdGordonRN wrote: And, yes, I use mph. I never got the feeling for knots. How did you get a feeling for wind speed in mph? When he was young he stuck his head out of his fathers car and felt the wind. Flies getting stuck to his lolling tongue may have been a bit unpleasent for him though. Cheers |
No Longer a Beginner!
And, yes, I use mph. I never got
the feeling for knots. Must be fun using a chart. S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster" "No shirt, no skirt, full service" |
No Longer a Beginner!
We refuse to go sailing if the wind is 9 mph Teh you are still beginner sailors....it is a challenge to sail in light air...it is sometimes harder to sail in light air....get a spinnaker and hone your skills in those less than 9 days.... -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
No Longer a Beginner!
Teh you are still beginner sailors....it is a challenge to sail in light
air...it is sometimes harder to sail in light air....get a spinnaker and hone your skills in those less than 9 days... Don't tell this to Wally! He thinks running a spin in light air is child's play! RB |
No Longer a Beginner!
How did you get a feeling for wind speed in mph?
All my life, I have had the weather reports on TV, and now on the web--all in MPH |
No Longer a Beginner!
Teh you are still beginner sailors....it is a challenge to sail in light
air...it is sometimes harder to sail in light air....get a spinnaker and hone your skills in those less than 9 days.... Forget that. Although a spinnaker might be interesting. What kind of point of sail can you get with a spinnaker--isn't it only for running? |
No Longer a Beginner!
If you're going to the web and not getting the marine forecast, you're still a
beginner. "EdGordonRN" wrote in message ... How did you get a feeling for wind speed in mph? All my life, I have had the weather reports on TV, and now on the web--all in MPH |
No Longer a Beginner!
If you're going to the web and not getting the marine forecast, you're still a
beginner. Not on the LIS. I find checking several web weather sites are more accurate than NOAA alone. If Edgar wants to use MPH what difference does it make? None. RB |
No Longer a Beginner!
Yes - the "lubbers" forecast (I use Wunderground) is handy for many aspects of
the weather. But for telling the wind strength and direction, as well as wave heights, the marine forecast is needed. In addition, the marine forecast will give wind and water predictions for both protected and unprotected waters, as well as any marine advisories. I would think that anyone venturing out, especially in a small boat, would be interested in these things. "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... If you're going to the web and not getting the marine forecast, you're still a beginner. Not on the LIS. I find checking several web weather sites are more accurate than NOAA alone. If Edgar wants to use MPH what difference does it make? None. RB |
No Longer a Beginner!
Jeff Morris wrote:
I would think that anyone venturing out, especially in a small boat, would be interested in these things. The operative words being "venturing out", when tied to the dock, what difference does it make? "None.", to quote Bob. Cheers Marty |
No Longer a Beginner!
EdGordonRN wrote:
Teh you are still beginner sailors....it is a challenge to sail in light air...it is sometimes harder to sail in light air....get a spinnaker and hone your skills in those less than 9 days.... Forget that. Although a spinnaker might be interesting. What kind of point of sail can you get with a spinnaker--isn't it only for running? Ed, perhaps you should have taken a lesson or two, look up asymmetric spinnakers and see what you can find about sailing with one, definitely not for running! Cheers Marty |
No Longer a Beginner!
Read again, Marty.
Not on the LIS. I find checking several web weather sites are more accurate than NOAA alone. Get your crayons out! What a dope! RB |
No Longer a Beginner!
If you're going to the web and not getting the marine forecast, you're still
a beginner. Why? Weather.com's beach report is perfect. I've gotton the marine report for our area, and it doesn't given any more information. You sound like you need to look "mariner" at all times. You wear one of those captain hats when you sail, don't you? |
No Longer a Beginner!
If Edgar wants to use MPH what difference does it make? None.
RB Exactly. Because the fact is, my wife and I sail all the time. We sailed today. We sailed, I believe a total of six miles, according to the road map I use as a chart. 3 miles was beating against approximately 11 mile an hour winds, and of course 3 miles on a run on the way back. What was cool, this time, is that we went into deeper waters and got some good splashes over the bow. We even planed a few times in some gusts, and on the way back we could feel the waves pushing us like our boat was body surfing. It was a good day. And imagine: I never consulted NOAA or a nautical chart even once. And we both refuse to use terms like "jibe-ho" or "helms-a-lee." |
No Longer a Beginner!
Yes - the "lubbers" forecast (I use Wunderground) is handy for many aspects
of the weather. But for telling the wind strength and direction, as well as wave heights, the marine forecast is needed. In addition, the marine forecast will give wind and water predictions for both protected and unprotected waters, as well as any marine advisories. I would think that anyone venturing out, especially in a small boat, would be interested in these things. Nonsense. Weather.com gives wind direction, speed, and wave height. It also gives temp, humidity, etc, and it forcasts each hour over a 12 hour stretch. We wouldn't be sailing during small craft advisories, so who cares about them. I can see if one has an off-shore boat that they'd want a marine radio, but we get by and we never use the term "lubber." Nor do we have a parrot that sits on our shoulder, nor do we hunt large white whales. |
No Longer a Beginner!
Ed, perhaps you should have taken a lesson or two, look up asymmetric
spinnakers and see what you can find about sailing with one, definitely not for running! Why take a lesson when I already know how to sail, and I sail all the time? Why take a lesson when I can read what I want to know in a book? As for spinnakers, we were running today and talked about it, and there's no real reason for it on our boat. Too much hassle and modification necessary. And for any other point of sail, the last thing we need is more sail area. Consider that the boat we sail is not a racing dinghy. It's well designed, very strong and fast, but it's not a racer. |
No Longer a Beginner!
Pretty easy really. 1 nm= about 1.1 mile, so speed in mph = 1.1 speed in
knots. 1.15 and a bunch of other decimal places, but who cares? When we sail, we sail for about two hours. 25 minutes to the dock, about 30 minutes to set up, 2 hours sailing, 30 minutes to take down and 25 minutes home. We flake the sail, and wash the boat the next day. We don't get burned out and we don't get frustrated. And we don't pretend to be sailors. We are sailors. Bottom line. |
No Longer a Beginner!
Sorry Ed, I don't pride myself in ignorance. It seems to be a virtue for you.
"EdGordonRN" wrote in message ... If you're going to the web and not getting the marine forecast, you're still a beginner. Why? Weather.com's beach report is perfect. I've gotton the marine report for our area, and it doesn't given any more information. You sound like you need to look "mariner" at all times. You wear one of those captain hats when you sail, don't you? |
No Longer a Beginner!
Edsprit wrote:
Pretty easy really. 1 nm= about 1.1 mile, so speed in mph = 1.1 speed in knots. 1.15 and a bunch of other decimal places, but who cares? When we sail, we sail for about two hours. 25 minutes to the dock, about 30 minutes to set up, 2 hours sailing, 30 minutes to take down and 25 minutes home. We flake the sail, and wash the boat the next day. We don't get burned out and we don't get frustrated. What does thinking in nautical miles have to do with getting burned out or frustrated? -- Wally www.forthsailing.com www.wally.myby.co.uk |
No Longer a Beginner!
What does thinking in nautical miles have to do with getting burned out or
frustrated? Nothing. The bottom line is: we sail. We don't need "sailorly" things unless they aid what we do. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com