There
were more terrorist attacks against Americans under Clinton than Bush.

You must be using the new math.


RB

On 07 May 2004 10:11:11 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

There
were more terrorist attacks against Americans under Clinton than Bush.

You must be using the new math.

Two embassies, one desstroyer, and the first WTC bombings. It adds
up. His math is sound. You must just be stupid.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Fri, 07 May 2004 06:46:32 -0400, Horvath wrote:

On 07 May 2004 10:11:11 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this crap:

There
were more terrorist attacks against Americans under Clinton than Bush.

You must be using the new math.

Two embassies, one desstroyer, and the first WTC bombings. It adds up.
His math is sound. You must just be stupid.

One man's terrorist, is another man's freedom fighter. I guess you
believe all the Afghan/Iraqi attacks are by freedom fighters.

You haven't even included the others in Africa and a few more in the
Phillipines.

Bush really did put a damper on the attacks.

Aggressive action gets results!

Bush saves lives!

Clinton kills!

That Bobsprit fellow is a gaping sphincter. He does it all for attention, he
can't get any earned recognition based on merit. What a loser! Bet his old
man is proud of him. Can't wait for the day when his kid can look him up on
the internet and be revolted by what he has spewed here. If the kid isn't
revolted, then he's following in the skidmarks of his dads underwear.

BC

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 07 May 2004 10:11:11 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

There
were more terrorist attacks against Americans under Clinton than Bush.

You must be using the new math.

Two embassies, one desstroyer, and the first WTC bombings. It adds
up. His math is sound. You must just be stupid.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Bush saves lives!


Wow. I wonder how many poor fools really think this is true. Scary.
Bye Bye Bushy!

RB

This from someone who has the intelligence of a common house
plant.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
link.net...
You haven't even included the others in Africa and a few more in the
Phillipines.

Bush really did put a damper on the attacks.

Aggressive action gets results!

Bush saves lives!

Clinton kills!

That Bobsprit fellow is a gaping sphincter. He does it all for attention,
he
can't get any earned recognition based on merit. What a loser! Bet his old
man is proud of him. Can't wait for the day when his kid can look him up
on
the internet and be revolted by what he has spewed here. If the kid isn't
revolted, then he's following in the skidmarks of his dads underwear.

BC

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 07 May 2004 10:11:11 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

There
were more terrorist attacks against Americans under Clinton than Bush.


You must be using the new math.

Two embassies, one desstroyer, and the first WTC bombings. It adds
up. His math is sound. You must just be stupid.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Well, you certainly qualify as stupid. More people died under Bush
(except Laura) than under Clinton. Well, if you count people like
the religious right, then I guess more people died because of Clinton.
Blow jobs kill sperm.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 07 May 2004 10:11:11 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

There
were more terrorist attacks against Americans under Clinton than Bush.

You must be using the new math.

Two embassies, one desstroyer, and the first WTC bombings. It adds
up. His math is sound. You must just be stupid.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!