oxzy, don't play dense.

Damn Jocks, you stated unequivocally

"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

It does, nuances or no...YOU WERE WRONG!



On 23 Mar 2004 00:09:29 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

oxzy, nuances are part and parcel of the word. you are not joony or
jeffies,
so don't play stupid like they do (they can't help it, you can).

Come now Jocks, telling half the story just won't cut it.

You stated that
"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

You still aren't man enough to admit when you're wrong?

On 22 Mar 2004 23:52:42 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

Oz1...of th

edify

\Ed"i*fy\, v. i. [imp. & p. p. Edified; p. pr. & vb. n. Edifying.] [F.
['e]difier, L. aedificare; aedes a building, house, orig., a fireplace
(akin
to
Gr. ? to burn, Skr. idh to kindle, OHG. eit funeral pile, AS. [=a]d, OIr.
aed
fire) + facere to make. See Fact, -fy.] 1. To build; to construct.
[Archaic]

There was a holy chapel edified. --Spenser.

2. To instruct and improve, especially in moral and religious knowledge;
to
teach

edification

\Ed`i*fi*ca"tion\, n. [L. aedificatio: cf. F. ['e]dification. See Edify.]
1.
The act of edifying, or the state of being edified; a building up,
especially
in a moral or spiritual sense; moral, intellectual, or spiritual
improvement;
instruction.




Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

that was the point, oxzy. there was no spiritual context for petie to address,
therefore he could not "edify"

I think not Jocks, I can hardly see him edifying you in the spiritual
sense

On 23 Mar 2004 00:51:11 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

oxzy, don't play dense. petie used the word incorrectly.

oxzy, the words are different and their usage is thus different. there
was
no
theological issue involved in Franks usage of the word "edification".

Well Jocks, you're nearly correct ...except that it was Peter ....and
he was refering to your edification / enlightenment with respect to
the testing of equipment

"Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need to
be
done to improve it before the next time it's used."

Actually, it appears that once again you are totally incorrect..what's
new eh?


as state, nuances of theology.

To quote you
"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

but you were correct re the nuances of theology...just got the main
part wrong.

second, for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". consult with a good dictionary and note that
"edification"
has nuances of theology associated with it.

Oh dear, he's on a roll now....
"ed·i·fi·ca·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-f-kshn)
n.

Intellectual, moral, or spiritual improvement; enlightenment.

Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahahaaa!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

I missed no point at all. I merely stated that the use of the term without a
spiritual context was misuse of the word. which it is.

You miss the point Jocks.. he was using the word to enlighten/educate
without any spiritual context

On 23 Mar 2004 00:58:07 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

that was the point, oxzy. there was no spiritual context for petie to
address,
therefore he could not "edify"

I think not Jocks, I can hardly see him edifying you in the spiritual
sense

On 23 Mar 2004 00:51:11 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

oxzy, don't play dense. petie used the word incorrectly.

oxzy, the words are different and their usage is thus different. there
was
no
theological issue involved in Franks usage of the word "edification".

Well Jocks, you're nearly correct ...except that it was Peter ....and
he was refering to your edification / enlightenment with respect to
the testing of equipment

"Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need to
be
done to improve it before the next time it's used."

Actually, it appears that once again you are totally incorrect..what's
new eh?


as state, nuances of theology.

To quote you
"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

but you were correct re the nuances of theology...just got the main
part wrong.

second, for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". consult with a good dictionary and note that
"edification"
has nuances of theology associated with it.

Oh dear, he's on a roll now....
"ed·i·fi·ca·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-f-kshn)
n.

Intellectual, moral, or spiritual improvement; enlightenment.

Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahahaaa!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

The use of the term in the context of jaxie is a misuse.


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
I missed no point at all. I merely stated that the use of the term without a
spiritual context was misuse of the word. which it is.

You miss the point Jocks.. he was using the word to enlighten/educate
without any spiritual context

On 23 Mar 2004 00:58:07 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

that was the point, oxzy. there was no spiritual context for petie to
address,
therefore he could not "edify"

I think not Jocks, I can hardly see him edifying you in the spiritual
sense

On 23 Mar 2004 00:51:11 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

oxzy, don't play dense. petie used the word incorrectly.

oxzy, the words are different and their usage is thus different. there
was
no
theological issue involved in Franks usage of the word "edification".

Well Jocks, you're nearly correct ...except that it was Peter ....and
he was refering to your edification / enlightenment with respect to
the testing of equipment

"Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need to
be
done to improve it before the next time it's used."

Actually, it appears that once again you are totally incorrect..what's
new eh?


as state, nuances of theology.

To quote you
"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

but you were correct re the nuances of theology...just got the main
part wrong.

second, for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". consult with a good dictionary and note that
"edification"
has nuances of theology associated with it.

Oh dear, he's on a roll now....
"ed·i·fi·ca·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-f-kshn)
n.

Intellectual, moral, or spiritual improvement; enlightenment.

Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahahaaa!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

yes, of course. words don't mean what words mean.

well, maybe if you are from some backward city-state of some long forgotten
empire.

'snot!

On 23 Mar 2004 01:19:20 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

I missed no point at all. I merely stated that the use of the term without
a
spiritual context was misuse of the word. which it is.

You miss the point Jocks.. he was using the word to enlighten/educate
without any spiritual context

On 23 Mar 2004 00:58:07 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

that was the point, oxzy. there was no spiritual context for petie to
address,
therefore he could not "edify"

I think not Jocks, I can hardly see him edifying you in the spiritual
sense

On 23 Mar 2004 00:51:11 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

oxzy, don't play dense. petie used the word incorrectly.

oxzy, the words are different and their usage is thus different.
there
was
no
theological issue involved in Franks usage of the word "edification".

Well Jocks, you're nearly correct ...except that it was Peter ....and
he was refering to your edification / enlightenment with respect to
the testing of equipment

"Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need to
be
done to improve it before the next time it's used."

Actually, it appears that once again you are totally incorrect..what's
new eh?


as state, nuances of theology.

To quote you
"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

but you were correct re the nuances of theology...just got the main
part wrong.

second, for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not
mean
"enlightenment". consult with a good dictionary and note that
"edification"
has nuances of theology associated with it.

Oh dear, he's on a roll now....
"ed·i·fi·ca·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-f-kshn)
n.

Intellectual, moral, or spiritual improvement; enlightenment.

Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahahaaa!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

jeggies, ask your wife to explain it to you.

The use of the term in the context of jaxie is a misuse.


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
I missed no point at all. I merely stated that the use of the term without
a
spiritual context was misuse of the word. which it is.

You miss the point Jocks.. he was using the word to enlighten/educate
without any spiritual context

On 23 Mar 2004 00:58:07 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

that was the point, oxzy. there was no spiritual context for petie to
address,
therefore he could not "edify"

I think not Jocks, I can hardly see him edifying you in the spiritual
sense

On 23 Mar 2004 00:51:11 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

oxzy, don't play dense. petie used the word incorrectly.

oxzy, the words are different and their usage is thus different.
there
was
no
theological issue involved in Franks usage of the word "edification".

Well Jocks, you're nearly correct ...except that it was Peter ....and
he was refering to your edification / enlightenment with respect to
the testing of equipment

"Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need to
be
done to improve it before the next time it's used."

Actually, it appears that once again you are totally incorrect..what's
new eh?


as state, nuances of theology.

To quote you
"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

but you were correct re the nuances of theology...just got the main
part wrong.

second, for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not
mean
"enlightenment". consult with a good dictionary and note that
"edification"
has nuances of theology associated with it.

Oh dear, he's on a roll now....
"ed·i·fi·ca·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-f-kshn)
n.

Intellectual, moral, or spiritual improvement; enlightenment.

Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahahaaa!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

ah, you are saying that city-state speak is NOT Newspeak?

yes, of course. words don't mean what words mean.

well, maybe if you are from some backward city-state of some long forgotten
empire.

Awww now you're getting personal, and taking off on a tangent using
the Jocks survival technique


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

jeggies?


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
jeggies, ask your wife to explain it to you.

The use of the term in the context of jaxie is a misuse.


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
I missed no point at all. I merely stated that the use of the term
without
a
spiritual context was misuse of the word. which it is.

You miss the point Jocks.. he was using the word to enlighten/educate
without any spiritual context

On 23 Mar 2004 00:58:07 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

that was the point, oxzy. there was no spiritual context for petie
to
address,
therefore he could not "edify"

I think not Jocks, I can hardly see him edifying you in the
spiritual
sense

On 23 Mar 2004 00:51:11 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

oxzy, don't play dense. petie used the word incorrectly.

oxzy, the words are different and their usage is thus different.
there
was
no
theological issue involved in Franks usage of the word
"edification".

Well Jocks, you're nearly correct ...except that it was Peter
.....and
he was refering to your edification / enlightenment with respect
to
the testing of equipment

"Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back
so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need
to
be
done to improve it before the next time it's used."

Actually, it appears that once again you are totally
incorrect..what's
new eh?


as state, nuances of theology.

To quote you
"for your enlightenment the word "edification" does not mean
"enlightenment". "

but you were correct re the nuances of theology...just got the
main
part wrong.

second, for your enlightenment the word "edification" does
not
mean
"enlightenment". consult with a good dictionary and note
that
"edification"
has nuances of theology associated with it.

Oh dear, he's on a roll now....
"ed·i·fi·ca·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-f-kshn)
n.

Intellectual, moral, or spiritual improvement;
enlightenment.

Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahahaaa!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.










Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

In article , Shen44
wrote:

Subject: Jenifer Clark's Gulf Stream 6/13/02
From: Peter Wiley

Shen44 wrote:

Actually, I'm surprised Jax didn't jump all over him for not saying "sea
trial"
rather than "field test".

We 'sea trial' ships. We 'field test' boats. This boat came out on
'Aurora Australis' from Casey base.

G I don't have a problem with either term when used in context

I don't have a problem with almost anything that gets me paid for
playing with boats :-) Starting to plan out next southern summer's work
program, who's going where.

..... Jax, on
the other hand......has problems, period.
The ship, otn mentioned, is probably the US counterpart to the Aurora
Australis.

Yeah, I see your USCG vessels come through here every couple years. Had
a good wander around 'Polar Star' a while back, probably couldn't do
that nowadays.

Glorious autumn weather here but alas there was little wrong with the
workboat, so now it's on its cradle on the hardstand behind my store.
It'll go back south next season.

I've seen a few of these on their return to US (US version) .... they've
obviously had some hard use but are well built.

6mm aluminium plate all seams fully welded to prevent water freezing
and breaking skip welds, twin 6 cyl diesels driving Hamilton jets.
About 6.5 tonnes each, they're nice toys.



Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need to be
done to improve it before the next time it's used. With equipment in
places we work, it has to work the first time and you can't run to the
store if you've forgotten something, so we test before it ships south
and after it returns. I know this sort of approach to a problem is
beyond Jax's comprehension, but just maybe something might filter
through.....

From Jax's response, it didn't .... but that's to be expected.

Typical Jaxass - go for the obfuscation, ignore the substance. Happens
every time because he's too thick to understand what's beng said. Why I
keep him in my KF. Funny he is, but that doesn't counterbalance the
painful and repetitive stupidity.

PDW

aussies spend too much time in the hot sun without wearing a hat, as witness
peties's rant below.

Subject: Jenifer Clark's Gulf Stream 6/13/02
From: Peter Wiley

Shen44 wrote:

Actually, I'm surprised Jax didn't jump all over him for not saying "sea
trial"
rather than "field test".

We 'sea trial' ships. We 'field test' boats. This boat came out on
'Aurora Australis' from Casey base.

G I don't have a problem with either term when used in context

I don't have a problem with almost anything that gets me paid for
playing with boats :-) Starting to plan out next southern summer's work
program, who's going where.

..... Jax, on
the other hand......has problems, period.
The ship, otn mentioned, is probably the US counterpart to the Aurora
Australis.

Yeah, I see your USCG vessels come through here every couple years. Had
a good wander around 'Polar Star' a while back, probably couldn't do
that nowadays.

Glorious autumn weather here but alas there was little wrong with the
workboat, so now it's on its cradle on the hardstand behind my store.
It'll go back south next season.

I've seen a few of these on their return to US (US version) .... they've
obviously had some hard use but are well built.

6mm aluminium plate all seams fully welded to prevent water freezing
and breaking skip welds, twin 6 cyl diesels driving Hamilton jets.
About 6.5 tonnes each, they're nice toys.



Just for Jaxie's edification, we test gear after we get it back so we
know what, if anything is wrong with it and what mods if any need to be
done to improve it before the next time it's used. With equipment in
places we work, it has to work the first time and you can't run to the
store if you've forgotten something, so we test before it ships south
and after it returns. I know this sort of approach to a problem is
beyond Jax's comprehension, but just maybe something might filter
through.....

From Jax's response, it didn't .... but that's to be expected.

Typical Jaxass - go for the obfuscation, ignore the substance. Happens
every time because he's too thick to understand what's beng said. Why I
keep him in my KF. Funny he is, but that doesn't counterbalance the
painful and repetitive stupidity.

PDW