Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#361
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
SPAM!!
In our area, some of the many "obvious advantages" include the ability to get out to good sailing waters, sail for half a day, and return to port within a few hours. If you can only sail on weekends, that's an "obvious advantage" over a boat that takes six hours to motor to a good sailing area, and six hours to motor back. Jim JAXAshby wrote: However, they (mac 26's) entail certain obvious advantages for sailing not that anyone but you can see. |
#362
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
SPAM!!
You asked why I wanted to keep the boat 25 miles from the sailing area. What I meant was that it is 25 miles from the blue water sailing areas in the Gulf, that I prefer. In our region, 95% of the marinas and slips are in the Kemah-Seabrook area, located between Houston and Galveston. I think the reason most people leave their boats here is that it is some distance inland and considered safer from hurricanes and other weather issues. There is a large bay near here in which we can sail for the afternoon. As mentioned below, I recently placed an order for one of the Mac 26M's. When it's delivered, I'll be able to motor down to Galveston and to the offshore blue water in about two hours. Or, I can tow the boat down to various points on the coast and launch it there. - I'll try several sailing areas and see how they compare and report back to the group. Jim |
#363
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
SPAM!!
Well, Johathan, if I'm that dumb, or that much of an asshole, I'm assuming that you won't be reading any more of my notes or responding to them. - In that case, all you have to do is to press the "down arrow" (on the lower right side of your keyboard), and you can quickly pass by my notes and move on to another topic. Or, even more convenient, you can easily set up a filter that will filter out all my notes, and all notes addressed to me, so that you don't even have to hit your "down" arrow. So your problems are solved, Johathan. - If you meant what you said, that is. Jim |
#364
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Scott Vernon wrote: As the NG moderator, I do. For my information, what material are you moderating out? that's for me to know, and you to find out.........later, much later. What's permitted, and what isn't? I'll let you know if you cross the line. And are the rules different for Mac owners and fixed hull owners? NO |
#365
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
stop it jax, you're making me hungry.
"JAXAshby" wrote ... SPAM!! SPAM!! SPAM!! |
#366
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, Jhim, the facts are that you already bought your boat, and
were looking here for some sort of validation. You didn't get it, decided no one responded properly, then decided to get on your high horse about lack of response. Sounds to me like you're the one who needs to press the down arrow. I mean the lever on the toilet. You're clearly dumb and an asshole, but not a winner there either. Since you don't like what I have to say, feel free to filter me out. I've been here a long time. I'll be here long after you're sick of your crackerjack box boat and have to sell it at a huge loss. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jonathan Ganz wrote: Ok. Well, I think we're pretty much finished with you. Just about everyone, including Jax, has tried to be helpful. You're not having any. And, I guess we'll just have to live with the fact that either you're not too bright or an asshole who is not too bright. Well, Johathan, if I'm that dumb, or that much of an asshole, I'm assuming that you won't be reading any more of my notes or responding to them. - In that case, all you have to do is to press the "down arrow" (on the lower right side of your keyboard), and you can quickly pass by my notes and move on to another topic. Or, even more convenient, you can easily set up a filter that will filter out all my notes, and all notes addressed to me, so that you don't even have to hit your "down" arrow. So your problems are solved, Johathan. - If you meant what you said, that is. Jim |
#367
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The rules are obvious to anyone with a modicum of intelligence.
You're obviously lacking in that department. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Scott Vernon wrote: As the NG moderator, I do. For my information, what material are you moderating out? What's permitted, and what isn't? And are the rules different for Mac owners and fixed hull owners? Jim SV "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Scott, you certainly don't have to read or respond to my notes. It's rather easy to click the down arrow and move on to another topic. Jim Scott Vernon wrote: Jim, this troll is all used up. Move on. "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... This note concerns the issue of intellectual honesty. As a follow-up to and summary of the many responses generated by this question, several hundreds of usually negative, usually dogmatic statements were posted regarding the MacGregor 26M, but none were posted by anyone who had actually sailed the 26M. Also, as far as I can determine, none were posted by anyone who had even spoken to someone who had actually sailed the boat. (Correct me if I missed one.) Additionally, there was a long string of comments by posters who had obviousaly confused various previous MacGregor boats with the current 26M (which incorporates major, substantive changes from the previous models). Additionally, most writers were not willing, even when corrected by knowledgeable members of the group, to admit that they were talking about another boat and didn't actually know what the 26M entailed. In other words, as a summary of this long and convoluted series of pontifications, few participants had the intellectual honesty to admit that they really didn't know what the hell they were talking about in the first place. - Of course, this doesn't meant that the 26M is a great boat. - But it does say something about the character and (lack of) intellectual honesty of many who posted under this subject string. Jim Jim Cate wrote: I'm considering the new MacGregor 26M for use in the Galveston-Houston area and would like to get comments from anyone who has seen or sailed on the boat. Or, anyone else. For sailing and motoring in this area, the MacGregor seems to have some advantages. - I'm aware of the largely negative comments on this ng regarding the MacGregor line. However, for the intended use, e.g., sailing and motoring with small kids (grandchildren), fishing, and doing some limited coastal cruising, the Mac 26M has the advantage that it will motor to a desired destination at around 24 mph and can therefore get to a desired sail or fishing area, and return, much more quickly than a fixed keel boat. This tends to minimize the "are we home yet" issue with small kids and non-sail-type guests. Also, in view of the hundreds of square miles of shallow bay waters in our area, the boat's ability to anchor in 15 inches of water, or to beach at one of the islands, would be an obvious advantage. (The 40-foot Valiant, although a great boat under sail offshore, was limited to around 8-10 knots under motor or sail. So, it took us five hours to get from the Kemah marina to the gulf, and we had to be careful to keep a sharp watch on the depth finder.) OK, the comparison is admittedly somewhat ludicrous. For the uses anticipated, however, the Mac may be a practical and fun choice. Also, the new "M" model seems to include some substantive improvements. - It now has both lead and the removable water ballast, has a fin keel (which I'm assuming may help in pointing), and a structural keel housing extending vertically from the deck to the ballast area. The boat reportedly includes additional fiberglass layers and other structural and ergonomic improvements derived from their experience over the years. As to it's sailing abilities, there is a video on the Mac web site comparing the 26M and the 26X under sail, and the new model is clearly much faster. (Assuming they didn't stage the race or doctor the video.) With a large genoa, it looks like it might be a fast sailing boat; it can reportedly plane under sail. A further consideration is that, if I bought the MacGregor, I would still have the opportunity to charter a wide variety of heavier boats kept under charter in our area. Conversely, I couldn't purchase a conventional fixed-keel boat and also charter a boat similar to the Mac. (I'm not into motor boats, or staying out in the Texas sun for hours on a powered fishing boat.) A negative factor is that the new Mac is fairly expensive when fully equiped, comparable in price to many used 30 - 32-foot boats. Comments from anyone regarding the sailing and motoring characteristics of the new 26M would be appreciated. Jim |
#368
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You forgot to mention that you're an idiot.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... In the interest of full disclosure, I recently placed an order for one of the new 26M boats. Having carefully studied all the helpful advice and unbiased evaluations posted on this and other newsgroups, it became obvious to me that the Mac 26M was definitely the best choice in the under $75,000 price range for my intended applications. So, I'm one of the lucky few who will be able to take delivery of this wonderful new model in the next few months, since demand far exeeds the supply, and deliveries are normally several months behind schedule. Thanks to all for the helpful and educational comments. Jim Jim Cate wrote: I'm considering the new MacGregor 26M for use in the Galveston-Houston area and would like to get comments from anyone who has seen or sailed on the boat. Or, anyone else. For sailing and motoring in this area, the MacGregor seems to have some advantages. - I'm aware of the largely negative comments on this ng regarding the MacGregor line. However, for the intended use, e.g., sailing and motoring with small kids (grandchildren), fishing, and doing some limited coastal cruising, the Mac 26M has the advantage that it will motor to a desired destination at around 24 mph and can therefore get to a desired sail or fishing area, and return, much more quickly than a fixed keel boat. This tends to minimize the "are we home yet" issue with small kids and non-sail-type guests. Also, in view of the hundreds of square miles of shallow bay waters in our area, the boat's ability to anchor in 15 inches of water, or to beach at one of the islands, would be an obvious advantage. (The 40-foot Valiant, although a great boat under sail offshore, was limited to around 8-10 knots under motor or sail. So, it took us five hours to get from the Kemah marina to the gulf, and we had to be careful to keep a sharp watch on the depth finder.) OK, the comparison is admittedly somewhat ludicrous. For the uses anticipated, however, the Mac may be a practical and fun choice. Also, the new "M" model seems to include some substantive improvements. - It now has both lead and the removable water ballast, has a fin keel (which I'm assuming may help in pointing), and a structural keel housing extending vertically from the deck to the ballast area. The boat reportedly includes additional fiberglass layers and other structural and ergonomic improvements derived from their experience over the years. As to it's sailing abilities, there is a video on the Mac web site comparing the 26M and the 26X under sail, and the new model is clearly much faster. (Assuming they didn't stage the race or doctor the video.) With a large genoa, it looks like it might be a fast sailing boat; it can reportedly plane under sail. A further consideration is that, if I bought the MacGregor, I would still have the opportunity to charter a wide variety of heavier boats kept under charter in our area. Conversely, I couldn't purchase a conventional fixed-keel boat and also charter a boat similar to the Mac. (I'm not into motor boats, or staying out in the Texas sun for hours on a powered fishing boat.) A negative factor is that the new Mac is fairly expensive when fully equiped, comparable in price to many used 30 - 32-foot boats. Comments from anyone regarding the sailing and motoring characteristics of the new 26M would be appreciated. Jim |
#369
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you were just trolling.
You will be back whining. Sailing experiences and a Mac are not compatible. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... katysails wrote: Jim stated: Again, an evaluation of the quality of the boat depends on the criteria used in the evaluation, and how the boat will be used. So the MacGregor obviously fits OYUR criteria...go buy one, but don't come whining back here...but then, maybe you're like Horvath with his blind love of Hunter's.... 1) As you suggested, I did place an order for one of the 26M's. 2) I won't come whining back to the group. 3) I'll be glad to report on my sailing experiences if anyone is interested. Jim |
#370
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jax cried:
SPAM!! I'm of the opinion that the guy is a MacGregor infiltrate, sent by the company to turn the attention of the group on their sorry product... -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |