Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Oz,
Did that former Patner have anything to do with that POS the Kiwi Built for the America's Cup Defense? smile What an object of Pride to show the world on World Wide TV of Kiwi boat building :^) Ole Thom |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Oz,
Did that former Patner have anything to do with that POS the Kiwi Built for the America's Cup Defense? smile What an object of Pride to show the world on World Wide TV of Kiwi boat building :^) Ole Thom Wasn't that a Farr project? |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to wonder who engineered the hull to
accept this 'add on' keel. It sounds to me like a disaster waiting to happen. I wonder if the scantlings are right for a glassed-on false keel? I doubt it. I can envision stress cracks galore. Wear your exposure suit at all times. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Simple, You are looking in the wrong direction. The Pile of **** is in Your Court. My Keel is a separate Keel that has been attached to a "Newport 30" hull and Fibre Glassed into the Hull/including the lead wing also incased in Fibre Glass. I've had both; Bolted on and Molded on. I can say, from experience after 14 years the molded in has given me zero problems. I can't say that with either of my Bolt ons |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Simple Simon wrote:
It did not originate with me but I can see the logic of it. Oh Geez, it is truly amazing what passes for logic in your mind. Your reaction, on the other hand, is illogical. It was the reaction of anyone with more than an elementary school education, a few moments exposure to high school physics, and the world outside a mental institution. But then I guess you applied the same logic to your selection of galvanized pipe to repair your broken boom. Master mariner, indeed. If you ever left your mooring you would be a hazard to navigation. As it is you are just a bad joke, a health hazard, and a marine pollutant. Rick |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I check my keel bolts every 6 mos or so. They're easily accessible on
the Cal 20. Doesn't hurt to check. When I hauled it the first time, several were loose. Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:59:29 GMT, scribbled thusly: On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:03:41 +1100, "Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza" wrote: I could never buy a C&C with their "smile" reputation because any cracking meands movement no matter what the owners/builders may say. I suspect that is the real reason Bubbles purchased his boat cheap. The crack means water ingress, the water one devoid of oxygen will corrode the keelbolts and then the real drama begins. I would be interested in seeing his current haulout shots to see if he had the problem fixed. This is just plain nonsense. The C&C smile is very rarely cause for alarm. Cracking does not always mean shifting or a breech. In the case of C&C, what it usually means is some of the extreme outer layer of fillet cracking due to stretching of the hard, non flexible fillet material. Umm what's causing the stretching? Movement? The keel joint itself remains water tight unless the keel bolts have not been properly torqued. Every spring, I spend all of 15 minutes checking the torque on those 5 big bolts. No big deal. I've never needed to check keel bolts more than once after a keel was installed unless there were unusual circumstances. ie grounding or extreme weather. First sign is usually cracking. My C&C had a crack all the way around the keel when I bought it. The keel bolts were not tightened properly. The keel had been professionally rebedded 5 years earlier, but the keel bolts had not been checked since then. Even at that, there was no, none, nada, zilch, leaking into the bilge Water can still get around the bolts without getting into the bilge. I simply torqued the bolts properly, ground out the crack a little bigger and filled it with Marine Tex. The crack has not re-appeared. This is a complete NON - ISSUE for people knowledgeable about boat construction. Oh OK, so next time I see a boat with cracks right around the hull/keel joint I'll just think about you and pass it off as nothing to worry about, Just torque em up and she'll be right mate. The famous C&C smile is cosmetic for the most part. I have seen boats of many brands with true keel separation. C&C is better than most in this regard because of the way the joint is designed. Cosmetic for the most part....What's the other part? BB Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:01:36 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: You know, when a sailor runs into a rock or other hard object on the bottom - maybe a coral head it is said that lead, being soft, will cushion the blow by deforming and absorbing some of the force thus sparing the structure of the yacht. Bwaaahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa! Sorry but SS is right on this one. A sharp hammer like impact imparts very high albiet near instantanious loads that break relatively brittle materials like glass and the glass fibers in composites. The soft lead would absorb some of the peak load and spread the rest over a longer period of time reducing the peak stress. That's why race bikes never use steel crash bars. Enough to make a difference? Yer pays yer money and .... |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey mister toy tugboat skipper, what makes you
so jealous of me? Is it because you know with your silly restored tugboat you really can't go anywhere, do anything, or even manage to fool yourself into thinking you are enjoying yourself? The only enjoyment you get out of your silly vessel is satisfaction you get when you think people are actually admiring your restoration efforts when all the while they are thinking, "waste of time, effort and money on a pipe dream". Real men such as those of us who live aboard and cruise and voyage under sail do not need the 'cosmetic' approval of a stream of dock passers-by to build up a sagging ego. We are secure in the knowledge that we are living a life centered on enjoying mother nature and the beauty of sail - not the polyurethane, chrome, wax, and buffer world of you showboaters. S.Simon "Rick" wrote in message link.net... Simple Simon wrote: It did not originate with me but I can see the logic of it. Oh Geez, it is truly amazing what passes for logic in your mind. Your reaction, on the other hand, is illogical. It was the reaction of anyone with more than an elementary school education, a few moments exposure to high school physics, and the world outside a mental institution. But then I guess you applied the same logic to your selection of galvanized pipe to repair your broken boom. Master mariner, indeed. If you ever left your mooring you would be a hazard to navigation. As it is you are just a bad joke, a health hazard, and a marine pollutant. Rick |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oz'
Loose from compression? You're asking the right question. I do believe that is what makes the bolts on a bolt on keel come loose. I believe that compression on the fibre glass causes it to take a permanent set (Even if just sitting on the hard) This set gives the, bolt on, the ability to work (Move) On my past boats I found this to be true. I installed packing under the washers before torquing. It gave me a dry hull but was never sure of the bolts outside the hull and the moisture penetrating the fibre glass on the drilled holes? Ole Thom |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ever do any mechanic work? Have you ever used a brass
hammer to say align a crankshaft that is pinned and pressed together? The brass hammer head deforms while the crankshaft counterweight does not. Very small movement of the counterweights can be attained instead of the large, uncontrolled movement that would knock the crankshaft out of alignment on the opposite side of the spectrum. This control and the fact the brass hammer is used because it is soft and does not damage the structure of the crankshaft as a steel hammer would is analogous to the forces applied on the hull of a boat if its keel hits an unmovable object. The same principle applies to a lead keel. The mass of lead, of course, is the primary consideration but the softness of the lead to cushion a blow is another consideration and makes lead a superior material to cast iron in addition the lead's extra mass. It is hard for me to believe you've been in the yachting field very long or done much reading to speak of without knowing this very obvious and widely known fact. S.Simon Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:01:36 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:08:21 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:43:14 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: It's heavier but is it soft enough to cushion possible impacts with the sea bottom? Since it is used to pierce armor I've got a feeling it is pretty stout stuff. S.Simon Cushion? WTF are you talking about? You know, when a sailor runs into a rock or other hard object on the bottom - maybe a coral head it is said that lead, being soft, will cushion the blow by deforming and absorbing some of the force thus sparing the structure of the yacht. S.Simon Bwaaahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa! Cappy that rates among the most idiotic things that you've ever written!! It did not originate with me but I can see the logic of it. Your reaction, on the other hand, is illogical. S.Simon Cappy could you fill me in on how much cushioning I could expect from say a 4 ton lump of solid lead and how it would achieve that cushioning? Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So far they haven't been loose, but I'm not losing much by checking
periodically. "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Oz' Loose from compression? You're asking the right question. I do believe that is what makes the bolts on a bolt on keel come loose. I believe that compression on the fibre glass causes it to take a permanent set (Even if just sitting on the hard) This set gives the, bolt on, the ability to work (Move) On my past boats I found this to be true. I installed packing under the washers before torquing. It gave me a dry hull but was never sure of the bolts outside the hull and the moisture penetrating the fibre glass on the drilled holes? Ole Thom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2004 Melbourne-King Island Yacht Race - Results and Race Report | General | |||
boat thieves back in busiess insurance results | General | |||
J/24 District 4 Results | General | |||
Bay Week results | ASA | |||
trace results | ASA |