Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pleas explain which "tables" you are talking about and what
calculations you are making for sextant altitude and time. You sure you want LHA? otn Simple Simon wrote: That's it but you need tables. You need tables because you measure zenith and local hour angle. S.Simon |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Sight Reduction Tables of course. I use HO249 for speed and simplicity. You must have local hour angle because the sight is always a combination of local hour angle and zenith. The tables help you to turn the local hour angle into latitude since the sun moves daily because of the tilt of the earth as the seasons progress. S.Simon "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... Pleas explain which "tables" you are talking about and what calculations you are making for sextant altitude and time. You sure you want LHA? otn Simple Simon wrote: That's it but you need tables. You need tables because you measure zenith and local hour angle. S.Simon |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wrong. You need the Almanac. For a noon sight, you need to know
declination to compute latitude. As for longitude, using the method you are referring to, you need to convert LMT at time of sight ( reason for error) to GMT, which you convert to GHA and then longitude. Again, if you had a clue as to what you were talking about, you would realize that this method was not all that accurate except in certain cases. LHA is measured from you WEST, to the body. Go back to reading. otn Simple Simon wrote: Sight Reduction Tables of course. I use HO249 for speed and simplicity. You must have local hour angle because the sight is always a combination of local hour angle and zenith. The tables help you to turn the local hour angle into latitude since the sun moves daily because of the tilt of the earth as the seasons progress. S.Simon "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... Pleas explain which "tables" you are talking about and what calculations you are making for sextant altitude and time. You sure you want LHA? otn Simple Simon wrote: That's it but you need tables. You need tables because you measure zenith and local hour angle. S.Simon |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For Longitude can't you just use an Analema? (This post was really an excuse to
use that word!) Actually, a one page text version of the Analema will be accurate to about 10 seconds for any year. The declination of the Sun at meridian passage, needed for Latitude, can also be found in a "one page perpetual" version, accurate to about 12 arc-minutes with interpolation. If anyone is interested in emergency traditional navigation, they should find "Particularized Navigation, How to Prevent Navigational Emergencies" by Francis W. Wright; its out of print but available from some sources. This includes a small book on celestial, and even smaller pamphlet with tables, and even yet smaller sheets for lifeboat navigation. -- -jeff "Constant Vigilance!" - Frances W. Wright "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... Wrong. You need the Almanac. For a noon sight, you need to know declination to compute latitude. As for longitude, using the method you are referring to, you need to convert LMT at time of sight ( reason for error) to GMT, which you convert to GHA and then longitude. Again, if you had a clue as to what you were talking about, you would realize that this method was not all that accurate except in certain cases. LHA is measured from you WEST, to the body. Go back to reading. otn Simple Simon wrote: Sight Reduction Tables of course. I use HO249 for speed and simplicity. You must have local hour angle because the sight is always a combination of local hour angle and zenith. The tables help you to turn the local hour angle into latitude since the sun moves daily because of the tilt of the earth as the seasons progress. S.Simon "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... Pleas explain which "tables" you are talking about and what calculations you are making for sextant altitude and time. You sure you want LHA? otn Simple Simon wrote: That's it but you need tables. You need tables because you measure zenith and local hour angle. S.Simon |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BG You'd need to define, as I haven't a clue as to what that is
(Analema). When you get "into" the study of methods of navigation, you tend to find many ways and "publications" that have been or are used for sights. Personally, I still prefer (or did when I was using them) the older tables (214?) for sight reduction. otn Jeff Morris wrote: For Longitude can't you just use an Analema? (This post was really an excuse to use that word!) Actually, a one page text version of the Analema will be accurate to about 10 seconds for any year. The declination of the Sun at meridian passage, needed for Latitude, can also be found in a "one page perpetual" version, accurate to about 12 arc-minutes with interpolation. If anyone is interested in emergency traditional navigation, they should find "Particularized Navigation, How to Prevent Navigational Emergencies" by Francis W. Wright; its out of print but available from some sources. This includes a small book on celestial, and even smaller pamphlet with tables, and even yet smaller sheets for lifeboat navigation. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its the funny "figure 8" on the globe - it describes the "equation of time"
http://hpccsun.unl.edu/nebraska/analema.html world's largest analema: http://www.uwm.edu/~kahl/Images/Weat.../analemma.html the equation of time: http://www.astronomynotes.com/nakedeye/s9.htm one page table that should be enough for Longitude: http://home.netcom.com/~abraxas2/eot.htm "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... BG You'd need to define, as I haven't a clue as to what that is (Analema). When you get "into" the study of methods of navigation, you tend to find many ways and "publications" that have been or are used for sights. Personally, I still prefer (or did when I was using them) the older tables (214?) for sight reduction. otn Jeff Morris wrote: For Longitude can't you just use an Analema? (This post was really an excuse to use that word!) Actually, a one page text version of the Analema will be accurate to about 10 seconds for any year. The declination of the Sun at meridian passage, needed for Latitude, can also be found in a "one page perpetual" version, accurate to about 12 arc-minutes with interpolation. If anyone is interested in emergency traditional navigation, they should find "Particularized Navigation, How to Prevent Navigational Emergencies" by Francis W. Wright; its out of print but available from some sources. This includes a small book on celestial, and even smaller pamphlet with tables, and even yet smaller sheets for lifeboat navigation. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Beautiful day on the Bay - again! (Repost) | General | |||
I do more by 12:00 noon... | ASA | |||
Cromwell, Nik Warrenson, same thing? | ASA | |||
FS: Beautiful 43' Garden Ketch in Oxford MD. | Marketplace |