The navigator© wrote:

It seems to me that there is not much idea around here as to what
constitutes seaworthiness.

Speaking for yourself only, of course.

Here in NZ the conditions are more
challenging than in many other places

Due to the constant inability of NZers to pay their debts?

DSK

Is your comprehension defective? YOU LOST.

Cheers MC

DSK wrote:

The navigator© wrote:


It seems to me that there is not much idea around here as to what
constitutes seaworthiness.


Speaking for yourself only, of course.


Here in NZ the conditions are more
challenging than in many other places


Due to the constant inability of NZers to pay their debts?

DSK

The navigator© wrote:

Is your comprehension defective?

I comprehend that you have yet to post a single fact in support of your
contention.


YOU LOST.

Sorry, you're wrong. I guess you are used to it though.

How about a consolation prize, a nice geodesic grid structure? Or maybe
you'd rather have an aerodynamic textbook explaining the difference
between planform and cross section?

DSK

Yes, I'll accept any books you send in partial payment of your debt to
me. Talking of geodesics, have you found out what one is yet and why
they DON'T completely obstruct the interior of racing boats? bwhahhahaha

Cheers MC

DSK wrote:

The navigator© wrote:


Is your comprehension defective?


I comprehend that you have yet to post a single fact in support of your
contention.



YOU LOST.


Sorry, you're wrong. I guess you are used to it though.

How about a consolation prize, a nice geodesic grid structure? Or maybe
you'd rather have an aerodynamic textbook explaining the difference
between planform and cross section?

DSK

The navigator© wrote:

Yes, I'll accept any books you send in partial payment of your debt to
me.

I don't owe you anything except possibly a hiding, you welsher.

Talking of geodesics, have you found out what one is yet

Considering that I have built them, probably yes.

and why
they DON'T completely obstruct the interior of racing boats?

Of course, ones that don't have them.


bwhahhahaha

What an intelligent response. Did you learn that in your Junior Naval
Architecture course?

DSK

DSK wrote:

The navigator© wrote:


Yes, I'll accept any books you send in partial payment of your debt to
me.


I don't owe you anything except possibly a hiding, you welsher.


So, what an excellent example of the human race you are. First you BS
and then when called out and shown to the world to be a BS artist you
threaten me with a hiding? You should hang your head in shame in apologize.


Talking of geodesics, have you found out what one is yet


Considering that I have built them, probably yes.


How do you build a geometry term?


and why
they DON'T completely obstruct the interior of racing boats?


Of course, ones that don't have them.


So you still think some do?



bwhahhahaha


What an intelligent response. Did you learn that in your Junior Naval
Architecture course?

It's an appropriate response to your buffonery.


Cheers MC

The navigator© wrote:


So, what an excellent example of the human race you are.

Why yes. Thanks for noticing.

First you BS
and then when called out and shown to the world to be a BS artist you
threaten me with a hiding?

Actually, it's funny that you accuse me of being a BS artist. Just within the
last week you have:

- conveniently dropped the distinction between section & profile when
discussing aerodynamic shapes

- failed utterly to correlate factors of small boat seaworthiness, and name
some more seaworthy small boats.

Probably more that's worthy of being listed, but I don't read all your posts.
You are as big a waste of bandwidth as the Crapton.

DSK