Even when presented with proof of their errors
liberals refuse to believe.

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.

S.Simon.


"Donal" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
7) Keep saying the US is going it alone in the war against
terrorism even though 20-30 nations have joined us in
the fight.

20-30? Name 6.

Here are 18 in NATO alone:
http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~irclu...ATO_terror.PDF

I notice that both France and Germany are in your list.

I think that you need to look for another link! Start here www.google,com

Better luck next time.


Regards


Donal - don't argue with me. You will lose!
--

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism.

Yeah, but not ours.

RB

Yes they are. They disagreed with our open war
with Iraq because they stood to lose big time
economically because of their contracts with
the govt. of Iraq. They do agree with in the
broader war against terrorism. Read the link.

It's about time you assholes had your noses
rubbed in the evidence.

S.Simon


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism.

Yeah, but not ours.

RB

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Even when presented with proof of their errors
liberals refuse to believe.

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.


If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

You seem to have painted yourself into a corner again.

Regards

Donal
--

The war against terrorism involves more than overt
action. There is a lot of covert stuff going on as well.

Countries who may not openly agree with covert action
still are supporting with the covert action and other
less violent action such as drying up funds terrorists
transfer from bank to bank to finance operations.

Your logic is faulty. There exists no corner into
which I can paint myself in this case. There exists
only the facts the link displayed to your chagrin those
facts being that ALL the NATO nations are with the
USA in the war against terrorism. That the majority
of nations don't provide soldiers to fight in Iraq does
not belie the fact they are with us in the war against
terrorism.

And, attempting to change the subject only shows that
you cannot argue with these facts. You lose yet again!


S.Simon



"Donal" wrote in message ...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Even when presented with proof of their errors
liberals refuse to believe.

Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.


If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

You seem to have painted yourself into a corner again.

Regards

Donal
--

Donal wrote:

"Simple Simon" wrote
Yes, both France and Germany are partners in the
war against terrorism. Believe it.


Is Iraq is part of the "War against Terrorism"?

If it is, then you cannot claim to have the support of France or Germany.

If you wish to claim the support of 20 countries for the "War against
Terrorism", then you must admit that the war in Iraq has nothing to with
fighting Terrorism.

It's just a matter of who's ox is getting gored. Saddam was indisputably
supporting Palistinian suicide bombers who attacked Israel. If you see
these bombers as terrorists then you must admit that Saddam was
supporting terrorism. If OTOH you see them as desperate patriots trying
to save their homeland from European invaders bent on genocide then
Saddam was not supporting terrorism, we are.

It's interesting that most of the European invaders were Jews driven out
of France and Germany after WW2.

"Vito" wrote in message ...
Donal wrote:

It's interesting that most of the European invaders were Jews driven out
of France and Germany after WW2.

Wrong. You're forgetting that over 800,000 Jews were driven out of Arab lands in the late
40's, early 50's. In fact, the number of Jews forcibly evicted (and generally not allowed
to take any significant property or money) from Arab lands exceeded the number of
Palestinian refugees, almost all of which left voluntarily.

Iran and Iraq, for instance, had major Jewish communities, going back 2500 years. At one
time Baghdad was 20% Jewish. Now, only a handful of Jews live in either country.
Although some of the Jews remained until the 70's,in that period essentially all were
evicted and all property confiscated.

The actual numbers are hard to sort out, because Russia is included as "Europe." Even so,
roughly half if the immigration in the 5 years after independence was from Africa & Asia.
And a large portion of the European immigrants were from Romania, and other Eastern
countries, not from France and Germany.

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
"Vito" wrote in message
...
Donal wrote:

It's interesting that most of the European invaders were Jews driven out
of France and Germany after WW2.

Wrong. You're forgetting that over 800,000 Jews were driven out of Arab
lands in the late
40's, early 50's. In fact, the number of Jews forcibly evicted (and
generally not allowed
to take any significant property or money) from Arab lands exceeded the
number of
Palestinian refugees, almost all of which left voluntarily.


Some were driven out of Spain several centuries ago ( in the 1200's, IIRC).
They still speak an antiquated form of Spanish.



Regards


Donal
--

Jeff Morris wrote:

"Vito" wrote in message ...
Donal wrote:

It's interesting that most of the European invaders were Jews driven out
of France and Germany after WW2.

Wrong. You're forgetting that over 800,000 Jews were driven out of Arab lands in the late
40's, early 50's. ...

You're right, I didn't know that and still tend to doubt the numbers,
but that doesn't contribute to the problems in the middle east today.
There were Jews in Palistine before WW2 and everybody more or less got
along - nothing like what was to come after WW2. NAZIs rounded up
Europes Jews. Their homes and shops were sold to locals and their money
hidden in Swiss banks. When the survivors returned the locals didn't
give those shops and homes back any quicker that the Swiss returned the
money leaving these Europeans with no choice but to invade Palestine and
establish "The Jewish State". Now they have to kill off the rest of the
Palestinians to make room for the Jews being kicked out of Arab
countries you mentioned. Sic semper something.

Vito wrote:

You're right, I didn't know that and still tend to doubt the numbers,
but that doesn't contribute to the problems in the middle east today.
There were Jews in Palistine before WW2 and everybody more or less got
along - nothing like what was to come after WW2.

Not really. The Arabs under Turkish rule had pogroms & ghettoes for the Jews. Worse than most in
Europe, but of course they considered it 'getting along' because the Jews could not fight back.



.... NAZIs rounded up
Europes Jews. Their homes and shops were sold to locals and their money
hidden in Swiss banks. When the survivors returned the locals didn't
give those shops and homes back any quicker that the Swiss returned the
money leaving these Europeans with no choice but to invade Palestine and
establish "The Jewish State".

Now that is the biggest load of malarkey you have spouted yet. Where do you get this 'history'
you come up with?

DSK