Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A
kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your logic is anything but logical.
A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Again, what is the definition of a vessel? Is a trolling line capable of
transport? No. Is a kite surfing board? I think you know the answer but are just too stubborn. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Your logic is anything but logical. A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NO! The water ski and the kite board without the
help of a towing vessel or a kite cannot transport anybody anywhere. Neither kite board or water ski can possibly be a vessel. Take an extreme example, the water skier who skis on his own two bare feet, I'm sure you've seen it done. Are the skier's two feet vessels? Is the skier a catamaran then? Bwahahahahhahahahha! S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Again, what is the definition of a vessel? Is a trolling line capable of transport? No. Is a kite surfing board? I think you know the answer but are just too stubborn. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Your logic is anything but logical. A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No the skier is a person and not a vessel. Your argument is illogical.
Is a ship with no motive power not a vessel? What about a barge? Bwhahhahhahahaa -as you say. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: NO! The water ski and the kite board without the help of a towing vessel or a kite cannot transport anybody anywhere. Neither kite board or water ski can possibly be a vessel. Take an extreme example, the water skier who skis on his own two bare feet, I'm sure you've seen it done. Are the skier's two feet vessels? Is the skier a catamaran then? Bwahahahahhahahahha! S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Again, what is the definition of a vessel? Is a trolling line capable of transport? No. Is a kite surfing board? I think you know the answer but are just too stubborn. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Your logic is anything but logical. A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You are clearly wrong. A kite board sinks when the operator stands on it. A water ski also sinks when the operator stands on it. Clearly neither is a vessel. A barge floats when cargo or people are on it. Even if it has no power it can drift from place to place with the winds and current. A barge clearly is a vessel. A water ski and a kite board in and of themselves cannot be defined as vessels. The person that stands on both is being pulled either by a boat or a kite. The person drags the ski or the board along fast enough so it gets up on plane. Both board and ski are more of an implement or a piece of apparel and not a vessel. Is a snorkeler's pair of swim fins to be called a vessel? Anybody who cannot see this valid point is an imbecile. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... No the skier is a person and not a vessel. Your argument is illogical. Is a ship with no motive power not a vessel? What about a barge? Bwhahhahhahahaa -as you say. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: NO! The water ski and the kite board without the help of a towing vessel or a kite cannot transport anybody anywhere. Neither kite board or water ski can possibly be a vessel. Take an extreme example, the water skier who skis on his own two bare feet, I'm sure you've seen it done. Are the skier's two feet vessels? Is the skier a catamaran then? Bwahahahahhahahahha! S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... Again, what is the definition of a vessel? Is a trolling line capable of transport? No. Is a kite surfing board? I think you know the answer but are just too stubborn. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Your logic is anything but logical. A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does a small fishing boat flying a kite to fish become a sailboat?
The_navigator© wrote: Again, what is the definition of a vessel? Is a trolling line capable of transport? No. Is a kite surfing board? I think you know the answer but are just too stubborn. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Your logic is anything but logical. A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, it's not using the kite for propulsion.
Cheers MC Kelton Joyner wrote: Does a small fishing boat flying a kite to fish become a sailboat? The_navigator© wrote: Again, what is the definition of a vessel? Is a trolling line capable of transport? No. Is a kite surfing board? I think you know the answer but are just too stubborn. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Your logic is anything but logical. A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. That would put them lower on the "pecking order." Besides, the courts have not
looked with favor on such attempts to circumvent the intent of the law. "Kelton Joyner" wrote in message ... Does a small fishing boat flying a kite to fish become a sailboat? The_navigator© wrote: Again, what is the definition of a vessel? Is a trolling line capable of transport? No. Is a kite surfing board? I think you know the answer but are just too stubborn. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Your logic is anything but logical. A kite boarder is not recognized by the COLREGS as a vessel. The kite, whether you call it a sail or not, is attached to the person and not the board. The board is not a vessel any more than a water ski is a vessel or a trolling line is a vessel or a taffrail log is a vessel or a chum bag is a vessel or a parasailer is a vessel. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... You still miss the point. Colregs apply to all vessels on the water. A kite surfer can carry you from one place to another and is therefore a vessel. As a vessel it is not powered by machinery or oars and is therefore a sailing vessel or NUC. As the kite fits the definaition of a sail I say it is a sailing vessel. Since they are not showing the day shapes for NUC my logic prevails and they are a sailing vessel. Cheers MC Donal wrote: "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... I say you are both wrong. In fact the kite surfer is a sailboat under existing Colregs. This is beacuse 1) the colregs describe all vessels (3a) and (2) the "kite" is used as a means of propulsion and is therefore a sail -by legal definition. You should know better than to claim that I am wrong. I awarded top marks to Neal because he is the only person to spot that the kite surfers constitute a "gray area" that needs to be cleared up. Personally, I feel that they are sailing vessels. Why has nobody answered the original question? ie What would you do if you were on a (starboard tack) collision course with a (port tack) kite surfer? Regards Donal -- |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|