Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Bobsprit is a terrorist sympathizer
Vito wrote:
...There was supposed to be an election to reunify Vietnam but polls showed Ho's communists winning because the Diem dictatorship was so bad Buddists (the majority) were burning themselves in protest. That's only somewhat true, the results were mixed and in places where the Communists were likely to lose, they stepped up their campaign of intimidation & propaganda. ...... Believing they could save the situation by delaying the election, McNamara & Co staged the Gulf of Tonkin Incident Actually, the election was pretty much shelved by mutual consent long before the Tonkin Gulf incident. But careful historical research has tended to support the view that this incident was a frame-up. The worst thing MacNamara did was to urge us into a war with no plan whatever for winning or even a clue how to defeat the prospective enemy. The whole gang was as blinded by the lustre of fighting Communism as today's gov't is blinded by lust for the war on terrorism (I bet you thought I was going to say cheap oil). .........100's of 1000s of young Americans were drafted and fought just as well and just as bravely as any before or since. But they were NEVER be allowed to win because by winning we'd become another invader just like the French had been. As far as most Vietnamese people were concerned, we *were* just another foreign invader, like the French. ......Then came a day when LBJ balked at sending the next increment of canon fodder and asked Westmoreland why Ho wouldn't match it. "He will" said Westy. Then where will this end? Never, was the answer. When I get the 500,000 combat troops McNamara promised me I'll be able to contain the situation but the fighting will go on indefinately, just like I told my boss Sec of Def McNamara. Westmoreland's grand strategic vision was the kill ratio. He figured that if we could kill 20 Vietnamese enemy combatants for every one of our soldiers they managed to kill, we would eventually win. He may have been right if the war had dragged on ten more years. But it was a very backwards-looking way of forming strategy, and totally ignored the politics of the situation. ..... A few days later LBJ announced he wouldn't seek reelection and after more years of killing to get an "honorable" peace (and make a few more $$$ off the war) Nixon & friends finally pulled out leaving the country to Ho's communists. Meanwhile we had protesters insulting their peers who had after all done their duty bravely and others despising the protesters without whom the war'd still be going on - and the real culprits went on to bigger and better screwups. Yes,it was indeed a very dark day when a tiny group of men were able to thwart our system of checks and balances, pull the wool on Dem's & Republicans alike, and kill 1000s. But worst of all, few know it even happened so it could easily happen again. Why do you think The Shrub found it so easy? Shucks, this cycle is repeated endlessly... sometimes the Speaker of the House wins the tug-of-war for a while, and holds powers broadly undefined by the Constitution. Sometimes the President gets away with mass murder. It's been happening in a merry go round since 1783. For the most part I agree with your statements here, and have similar conclusions about the results. DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A terrorist is a Terrorist is a Terrorist | ASA | |||
Bobsprit is superior - plain and simple. | ASA | |||
The Real Imposter! | ASA | |||
Bobsprit kills hundreds | ASA | |||
Bobsprit may be a troll . . . | ASA |