Even Bush has admitted that there is no connection.

This is true. Bush has become (finally) clear that there are no proven
connections. Does Neal think he's lying?

RB

There are no proven links between myself and Fidel
Castro either. Does that mean we have never had
dealings? There is also no conclusive proof that
former President Clinton had sex with Monica
in the Oval Office but we all know he did. Remember,
he denied 'having sex with that woman, Monica
Lewinski'.

President Bush said there is no 'conclusive' proof that
Saddam had anything to do with the events of Sept.
11, 2001. This does not mean there is not plenty of
circumstantial evidence - enough such evidence to
conclude Saddam and Al Queda were in bed with
each other. Salman Pak is enough circumstantial
evidence along with Saddam's other terrorist
activities to proceed with ridding the world
of his terrorist regime. A terrorist is a terrorist
is a terrorist. If you pacifists don't like it then
live with it because there is NOTHING you can
do about it but further whining that makes you
look like a bunch of foolish spoiled brats.

S.Simon


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
Even Bush has admitted that there is no connection.

This is true. Bush has become (finally) clear that there are no proven
connections. Does Neal think he's lying?

RB

A terrorist is a terrorist
is a terrorist.

And yet the terrorists that planned 9/11 and their powerful leader is still
free while Americans dies in an unrelated battle in Iraq.
Wonderful.

RB

Unrelated? I just explained how it's related.
A terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist and we
are engaged in a war against terrorists and
the majority of Americans support the war
against terrorists.

I know you don't like it but try to live with
it because there ain't a thing you can do
about it other than whine and display your
ignorance.

S.Simon
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
A terrorist is a terrorist
is a terrorist.

And yet the terrorists that planned 9/11 and their powerful leader is still
free while Americans dies in an unrelated battle in Iraq.
Wonderful.

RB

Unrelated? I just explained how it's related.


Your "explanation" is invalid and predicated on nothing. If you're going to
support the murder of US Troops you'll have to do better.

RB-a true patriot

and
the majority of Americans support the war
against terrorists.


Not any more.


RB

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


Unrelated? I just explained how it's related.
A terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist and we
are engaged in a war against terrorists and
the majority of Americans support the war
against terrorists.

How many terrorists were there in Iraq before the war? How many are there
now?

Bush seems to be losing the war -- BIG time!!



Regards


Donal
--

How many terrorists were there in Iraq before the war? How many are there
now?

Bush seems to be losing the war -- BIG time!!

Exactly. Bush is pooring gas on a fire, fanning the flames, pooring lighter
fluid on that and then smothering it with a nice load of gunpowder.
He's doing exactly what terrorists dream about...someone bringing the war to
them.
Their numbers are now increasing while our presense in Iraq only makes the
nature of the attacks more violent with each passing day. Terrorists live for
one thing and Bush is happily playing into their hands.

RB

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
A terrorist is a terrorist
| is a terrorist. If you pacifists don't like it then
| live with it because there is NOTHING you can
| do about it but further whining that makes you
| look like a bunch of foolish spoiled brats.

So... when a government has had direct links to a terrorist and has admitted
supplying that terrorist with training and equipment... then they also are
terrorists??

CM

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
A terrorist is a terrorist
| is a terrorist. If you pacifists don't like it then
| live with it because there is NOTHING you can
| do about it but further whining that makes you
| look like a bunch of foolish spoiled brats.

So... when a government has had direct links to a terrorist and has
admitted
supplying that terrorist with training and equipment... then they also are
terrorists??

Good question, Mooron. I doubt that Neal has the courage to answer!



Regards


Donal
--