There's No Way Around It!
 

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I?


Maybe I meant Horvath?? I can hardly tell the difference between you these
days!



Regards


Donal
--

There's No Way Around It!
 

Bobsprit wrote:
would know that. Sony TRV-900, sliced using Final Cut Pro.

Welcome aboard. Don't flop about too much.

Kinda desperate, aint ya!
Sorry to have embarassed you so badly! You STILL couldn't tell the
diff between a still and a video frame!

I've never owned a video camera or even done video.


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

There's No Way Around It!
 

Sorry to have embarassed you so badly! You STILL couldn't tell the
diff between a still and a video frame!

I've never owned a video camera or even done video.

I doubt you've done much photography of any kind.
FYI, that pic was also taken with a Camedia. Set to automatic, and clamped to
the pulpit rail with a Gitzo extender. No big deal.
A video slice WOULD show blur and artifacts, dopey.
Good grief...what a pounding you're taking!

RB

There's No Way Around It!
 

Bobsprit wrote:
Sorry to have embarassed you so badly! You STILL couldn't tell the
diff between a still and a video frame!

I've never owned a video camera or even done video.

I doubt you've done much photography of any kind.
FYI, that pic was also taken with a Camedia. Set to automatic, and
clamped to the pulpit rail with a Gitzo extender. No big deal.
A video slice WOULD show blur and artifacts, dopey.

Sheesh! What an idiot! You're calling me "dopey" after I *didn't* make the
statement you're opposing! I didn't say video *would* have caused blurring,
fool!

What is the 35mm-equivalent focal length of this Camedia?


Good grief...what a pounding you're taking!

Take a look at your own manufactured 'victory' and keep pounding yourself.


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

There's No Way Around It!
 

Sheesh! What an idiot! You're calling me "dopey" after I *didn't* make the
statement you're opposing! I didn't say video *would* have caused blurring,
fool!

If you had a clue or brains to form a clue, you'd have realized that it
couldn't have been a video frame.
Sorry, you've now been overexposed as an idiot!

Bwahahahahaha!

RB

There's No Way Around It!
 

He's the one with breasts.

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
I?


Maybe I meant Horvath?? I can hardly tell the difference between you
these
days!



Regards


Donal
--

There's No Way Around It!
 

"Bobsprit" wrote in message

| FYI, that pic was also taken with a Clamedia.

What a load of Clap... er I meant Crap!

CM

There's No Way Around It!
 

agreed most people over spend when 1 mega pix. is good
enough for the average user, not unless your into
major photo editing.

NH_/)_

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
I use a Kodak disposible camera. Good quality for $6 at WalMart. I've
been
thinking about going digital. What camera would you recommend for under
$50?

Scotty



"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
It certainly wasn't a Nikon F4 with a data-back... that's what I use.
Plus
ten grand in lenses. everything from a 17 Fisheye, 500 Catadioptric up
to
a
500 to 2000 telephoto zoom at F11 [okay it's really a 250 to 1000 at
F5.6
but with the Nikon 2x teleconverter....] Flashes and slaves... it
makes
the pros drool in envy.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Good lord, Wally. Give it up. You know nothing about photography.
You
| lost. Going sailing...enjoy your work-day!
|
| You mean you really did put a cheap teleconverter on the Nikon??
|
| Tell us again what you think was used to take the pic....
|
| RB

There's No Way Around It!
 

Who is that butt ugly woman driving? Must be Horass...

Is it Katy ?

NH_/)_

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

There's No Way Around It!
 

Katy is beautiful. It's Horass for sure.

"NH_/)_" wrote in message
om...
Who is that butt ugly woman driving? Must be Horass...

Is it Katy ?

NH_/)_

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message