There's No Way Around It!
 

It certainly wasn't a Nikon F4 with a data-back... that's what I use. Plus
ten grand in lenses. everything from a 17 Fisheye, 500 Catadioptric up to a
500 to 2000 telephoto zoom at F11 [okay it's really a 250 to 1000 at F5.6
but with the Nikon 2x teleconverter....] Flashes and slaves... it makes
the pros drool in envy.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Good lord, Wally. Give it up. You know nothing about photography. You
| lost. Going sailing...enjoy your work-day!
|
| You mean you really did put a cheap teleconverter on the Nikon??
|
| Tell us again what you think was used to take the pic....
|
| RB

There's No Way Around It!
 

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
the second photo. Half slides on an 8x10 cassette is standard,
exposing twice, then dodging with the enlarger.

Ah, like a sort of half-frame that yields two 5x8s?

Good lord, Wally. If you haven't worked with 8x10 gear, it's a bit late
for you
to learn.

Oh dear! Bob's been on Google again. Now he's pretending that he knows
about photography.!!!



Bwawaaaaawaaaaa. Haahahahahahhaaaa.



Regards


Donal
--

There's No Way Around It!
 

"Donal" wrote

Oh dear! Bob's been on Google again. Now he's pretending that he knows
about pornography.!!!


he just may well.

There's No Way Around It!
 

I use a Kodak disposible camera. Good quality for $6 at WalMart. I've been
thinking about going digital. What camera would you recommend for under
$50?

Scotty



"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
It certainly wasn't a Nikon F4 with a data-back... that's what I use.
Plus
ten grand in lenses. everything from a 17 Fisheye, 500 Catadioptric up to
a
500 to 2000 telephoto zoom at F11 [okay it's really a 250 to 1000 at F5.6
but with the Nikon 2x teleconverter....] Flashes and slaves... it makes
the pros drool in envy.

CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| Good lord, Wally. Give it up. You know nothing about photography. You
| lost. Going sailing...enjoy your work-day!
|
| You mean you really did put a cheap teleconverter on the Nikon??
|
| Tell us again what you think was used to take the pic....
|
| RB

There's No Way Around It!
 

Who is that butt ugly woman driving? Must be Horass...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
...
You're passing off a one time lucky shot as talent... in your case it's
luck.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| You talk a good
| photo, Bob, but you can't produce one.
|
| When you can shoot like this, get back to us!
|
| http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/stargray.jpg
|
| Now, think DOV and consider how I got this shot with a Nikon F series
body
with
| a standard 50mm lens.
| Yeah, you know photography!
|
| Bwahahahahaha!
|
| RB
|
|

There's No Way Around It!
 

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
| I use a Kodak disposible camera. Good quality for $6 at WalMart. I've
been
| thinking about going digital. What camera would you recommend for under
| $50?

The HP635 with the docking port... it's $259 Cdn... that's about $50 bucks
USD. I use a Kodak DC290 for work photos.... but it was $1500 two years ago
when I bought it. Most of the pics on my webshots site are done with the
Kodak digital.

If you're serious about a low cost good quality digital that can take 30
sec. video clips and good stills... you can't go wrong with the HP 635. We
got the docking port that allows push button downloads to a computer with
USB or you can view both video and stills on the TV with a remote control.
It's a nice little unit... cost with the docking port was $400+ Cdn.
including tax.

CM

There's No Way Around It!
 

A camera. If it was a 35mm camera, then the angle of view looks a little
wide to have been a 50mm standard lens.

I hate to break it to you, but it's not taken with a still camera of any kind.
Anyone who looks at that pic and knows what cameras can do would know that.
Sony TRV-900, sliced using Final Cut Pro.

RB

There's No Way Around It!
 

Capt. Mooron wrote:

It certainly wasn't a Nikon F4 with a data-back... that's what I
use. Plus ten grand in lenses. everything from a 17 Fisheye, 500
Catadioptric up to a 500 to 2000 telephoto zoom at F11 [okay it's
really a 250 to 1000 at F5.6 but with the Nikon 2x teleconverter....]
Flashes and slaves... it makes the pros drool in envy.

I have a Digital Ixus. It's very small and very light.

Anyway, after I drew him into that little skrmish, I see Bob has tripped
over his desire to profess his wisdom of photography by admitting that he
was lying about it being an F4.


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

There's No Way Around It!
 

Bobsprit wrote:

I hate to break it to you, but it's not taken with a still camera of
any kind. Anyone who looks at that pic and knows what cameras can do
would know that. Sony TRV-900, sliced using Final Cut Pro.

Welcome aboard. Don't flop about too much.


--
Wally
www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com
Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light.

There's No Way Around It!
 

would know that. Sony TRV-900, sliced using Final Cut Pro.

Welcome aboard. Don't flop about too much.

Kinda desperate, aint ya!
Sorry to have embarassed you so badly! You STILL couldn't tell the diff between
a still and a video frame!

RB