LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air

Found the 'old' chart. It reads '' controlling depths in feet at Mean Low
Water (MLW)''. AND; depths reffered to soundings (MLW)''.

Scotty


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Are you sure?
Don't keep charts at the house, thus the ''I believe'' .

SV



"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
No they are not. Read the chart legend

Cheers MC

Scott Vernon wrote:
I believe that
charted depths are given at MLW and it's up to the sailor to know the

tide
table and apply it.






  #2   Report Post  
Jeff Morris
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air

How old is that chart? All of my US charts from the recent past use MLLW as the datum for
soundings. I even checked in my Chesapeake ChartKit to see if they were different.

OK - Here's a quiz: What's the meaning of LLWLT?

BTW, I thought of commenting on the "8 feet above MLW" also - around here we have 10 foot
tides and flooding is measured above MHW

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Found the 'old' chart. It reads '' controlling depths in feet at Mean Low
Water (MLW)''. AND; depths reffered to soundings (MLW)''.

Scotty


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Are you sure?
Don't keep charts at the house, thus the ''I believe'' .

SV



"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
No they are not. Read the chart legend

Cheers MC

Scott Vernon wrote:
I believe that
charted depths are given at MLW and it's up to the sailor to know the

tide
table and apply it.







  #3   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air


"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...
How old is that chart? All of my US charts from the recent past use MLLW

as the datum for
soundings. I even checked in my Chesapeake ChartKit to see if they were

different.

OK - Here's a quiz: What's the meaning of LLWLT?


Lower Low Water Large Tide.


Sounds similiar to LAT.


Regards


Donal
--


  #4   Report Post  
Jeff Morris
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air

If you were going to take the time to look it up, you could have at least said how it is
defined.


"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...
How old is that chart? All of my US charts from the recent past use MLLW

as the datum for
soundings. I even checked in my Chesapeake ChartKit to see if they were

different.

OK - Here's a quiz: What's the meaning of LLWLT?


Lower Low Water Large Tide.


Sounds similiar to LAT.


Regards


Donal
--




  #5   Report Post  
The_navigator©
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air

Here (and the UK I believe) it is the "lowest astromical tide". If you
think about it, that is the only sensible datum for a _sounding_!

Cheers MC

Jeff Morris wrote:

If you were going to take the time to look it up, you could have at least said how it is
defined.


"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...

How old is that chart? All of my US charts from the recent past use MLLW


as the datum for

soundings. I even checked in my Chesapeake ChartKit to see if they were


different.

OK - Here's a quiz: What's the meaning of LLWLT?


Lower Low Water Large Tide.


Sounds similiar to LAT.


Regards


Donal
--








  #6   Report Post  
Jeff Morris
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air

No - LAT is "Lowest Astronomical Tide" or the lowest tide that would be predicted. LLWLT,
or "Lower Low Water Large Tide" is the average of the lowest low water for each year in a
19 year cycle.

Presumably, LAT would be the lowest of the lowest low water in the 19 year cycle, not the
average.



"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
Here (and the UK I believe) it is the "lowest astromical tide". If you
think about it, that is the only sensible datum for a _sounding_!

Cheers MC

Jeff Morris wrote:

If you were going to take the time to look it up, you could have at least said how it

is
defined.


"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...

How old is that chart? All of my US charts from the recent past use MLLW

as the datum for

soundings. I even checked in my Chesapeake ChartKit to see if they were

different.

OK - Here's a quiz: What's the meaning of LLWLT?

Lower Low Water Large Tide.


Sounds similiar to LAT.


Regards


Donal
--








  #7   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air

According to Chapman;

MLW: the avg. height of all low waters at a place over a 19-year cycle.


MLLW: the avg. height of the lower low waters over a 19-year cycle.

SV


"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...
No - LAT is "Lowest Astronomical Tide" or the lowest tide that would be

predicted. LLWLT,
or "Lower Low Water Large Tide" is the average of the lowest low water for

each year in a
19 year cycle.

Presumably, LAT would be the lowest of the lowest low water in the 19 year

cycle, not the
average.



"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
Here (and the UK I believe) it is the "lowest astromical tide". If you
think about it, that is the only sensible datum for a _sounding_!

Cheers MC

Jeff Morris wrote:

If you were going to take the time to look it up, you could have at

least said how it
is
defined.


"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...

How old is that chart? All of my US charts from the recent past use

MLLW

as the datum for

soundings. I even checked in my Chesapeake ChartKit to see if they

were

different.

OK - Here's a quiz: What's the meaning of LLWLT?

Lower Low Water Large Tide.


Sounds similiar to LAT.


Regards


Donal
--










  #8   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air


"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...
No - LAT is "Lowest Astronomical Tide" or the lowest tide that would be

predicted. LLWLT,
or "Lower Low Water Large Tide" is the average of the lowest low water for

each year in a
19 year cycle.

Presumably, LAT would be the lowest of the lowest low water in the 19 year

cycle, not the
average.


That would really depend on whether the lowest low had been predicted,
wouldn't it?

Anyway, LAT is much better than LLWLT.

For one thing, you can remember the letters without having to look them up!


Regards


Donal
--





  #9   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air


"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...
If you were going to take the time to look it up, you could have at least

said how it is
defined.

Don't be churlish!
You didn't say that we weren't allowed to use Google....Gimme the points!



Regards


Donal
--



  #10   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Heavy Air

Well, right under the sea serpent and above the mermaid it says '' 1927
DATUM , Soundings in Feet at MLW''

Low Low Water Low Tide?????

SV

"Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message
...
How old is that chart? All of my US charts from the recent past use MLLW

as the datum for
soundings. I even checked in my Chesapeake ChartKit to see if they were

different.

OK - Here's a quiz: What's the meaning of LLWLT?

BTW, I thought of commenting on the "8 feet above MLW" also - around here

we have 10 foot
tides and flooding is measured above MHW

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Found the 'old' chart. It reads '' controlling depths in feet at Mean

Low
Water (MLW)''. AND; depths reffered to soundings (MLW)''.

Scotty


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Are you sure?
Don't keep charts at the house, thus the ''I believe'' .

SV



"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
No they are not. Read the chart legend

Cheers MC

Scott Vernon wrote:
I believe that
charted depths are given at MLW and it's up to the sailor to know

the
tide
table and apply it.











 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heavy displacement vs Medium Displacement for Ocean Passages Bart Cruising 25 June 9th 04 04:41 AM
When You Hear The Heavy Accent & The Poor Phone Connection... HANG UP!!! ------ JUhtjEdZscw Angelica Whitewater 2 June 1st 04 10:44 PM
When You Hear The Heavy Accent & The Poor Phone Connection... HANG UP!!! ------ JUhtjEdZscw Angelica Power Boat Racing 2 June 1st 04 10:44 PM
When You Hear The Heavy Accent & The Poor Phone Connection... HANG UP!! ____ UGYAiMGRr Brian D Boat Building 16 April 13th 04 02:17 AM
When You Hear The Heavy Accent & The Poor Phone Connection... HANG UP!! ____ UGYAiMGRr Brian D Cruising 19 March 31st 04 05:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017