Did you read what exactly you were looking at? That is the total yearly
statement amount, not the shortfall in income to pay it.That is not what you
are showing here, you have not nearly enough information, go here to begin:
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/com/comlimit.htm then go he
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opddebtsch2003.htm , the stuff in
parathenses is a surplus. Concernin the year 2000, did you notice the
reduction from the last year? Did you check the income to pay that amount?
We are talking about a debt shortfall, not a debt we have the money to
pay-off.
"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:19:55 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Horrry isn't lying. He's just stupid.

Here's the truth, dumbass.



09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00

SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT


Eat it, dumbass.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

You're doing the equivalent of trying to explain algebra to a
chimpanzee, and this insults chimpanzees.

"The Carrolls" wrote in message
news
Did you read what exactly you were looking at? That is the total yearly
statement amount, not the shortfall in income to pay it.That is not what
you
are showing here, you have not nearly enough information, go here to
begin:
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/com/comlimit.htm then go he
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opddebtsch2003.htm , the stuff in
parathenses is a surplus. Concernin the year 2000, did you notice the
reduction from the last year? Did you check the income to pay that amount?
We are talking about a debt shortfall, not a debt we have the money to
pay-off.
"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:19:55 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Horrry isn't lying. He's just stupid.

Here's the truth, dumbass.



09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00

SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT


Eat it, dumbass.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 23:58:35 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

You're doing the equivalent of trying to explain algebra to a
chimpanzee, and this insults chimpanzees.

Do you have to turn everything into one of your homosexual fantasies?




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

So you're actually an chimp? I thought you were a chump.
Thanks for the clarification.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 23:58:35 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

You're doing the equivalent of trying to explain algebra to a
chimpanzee, and this insults chimpanzees.

Do you have to turn everything into one of your homosexual fantasies?




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 03:27:31 GMT, "The Carrolls"
wrote this crap:

Did you read what exactly you were looking at?

Of course.

That is the total yearly
statement amount, not the shortfall in income to pay it.

This is the debt, not the spending.



Here's the truth, dumbass.



09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00

SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT


Eat it, dumbass.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

He looked, but he can't read.

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 03:27:31 GMT, "The Carrolls"
wrote this crap:

Did you read what exactly you were looking at?

Of course.

That is the total yearly
statement amount, not the shortfall in income to pay it.

This is the debt, not the spending.



Here's the truth, dumbass.



09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00

SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT


Eat it, dumbass.





Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!




Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!