Let there be Nav. Light
 

"Gary L. Burnore" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:02:22 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote:

When you're right, you're right.


Gonna netkkkop some more, Franz?

Gonna molest your daughter again, Gary?

Let there be Nav. Light
 

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:47:14 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.disasters.aviation:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:12:35 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:



Madam Vinyl wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:16:13 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 03:39:04 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .

Is "chunder" like where you make a complete ass of yourself
on
usenet?

You are the authority on this kind of stuff, what do you say?

Yes, I've seen you chundering along for a few years now!


Jerry

Say goodnight, Jerry....

Go **** yourself, stupid ****.

Heheee. I wouldn't have expected any less from you, Jerry.

Why do you continue to torment your opponent when he's clearly
dead?

You'd better batten down the hatches.

So you are saying it's going to be a rough voyage?

Gale-force stupidity from you is predicted.

Blowing wind swells your sails.

Let there be Nav. Light
 

Warrior Princess wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:47:14 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.disasters.aviation:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:12:35 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:



Madam Vinyl wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:16:13 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 03:39:04 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .

Is "chunder" like where you make a complete ass of yourself
on
usenet?

You are the authority on this kind of stuff, what do you say?

Yes, I've seen you chundering along for a few years now!


Jerry

Say goodnight, Jerry....

Go **** yourself, stupid ****.

Heheee. I wouldn't have expected any less from you, Jerry.

Why do you continue to torment your opponent when he's clearly
dead?

You'd better batten down the hatches.

So you are saying it's going to be a rough voyage?

Gale-force stupidity from you is predicted.

Blowing wind swells your sails.

That's a sweet little grasso fire you and Mooron have going
there. Did you train it to be self-stoking or was that its
natural aptitude?
--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

Let there be Nav. Light
 

"Oz1" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:21:43 -0400, JL Grasso
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:01:03 -0400, JL Grasso
wrote:



email-a-****wit:





Well, you lot are nothing if not original!

Hmm original it is!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.
I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Let there be Nav. Light
 

JL Grasso wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:57:09 +0930, Tim Fatchen
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:



JL Grasso wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:59:43 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote in alt.disasters.aviation:



Warrior Princess wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:47:14 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.disasters.aviation:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:12:35 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:



Madam Vinyl wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:16:13 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 03:39:04 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .

Is "chunder" like where you make a complete ass of yourself
on
usenet?

You are the authority on this kind of stuff, what do you say?

Yes, I've seen you chundering along for a few years now!


Jerry

Say goodnight, Jerry....

Go **** yourself, stupid ****.

Heheee. I wouldn't have expected any less from you, Jerry.

Why do you continue to torment your opponent when he's clearly
dead?

You'd better batten down the hatches.

So you are saying it's going to be a rough voyage?

Gale-force stupidity from you is predicted.

Blowing wind swells your sails.

That's a sweet little grasso fire you and Mooron have going
there. Did you train it to be self-stoking or was that its
natural aptitude?

Ah, polliwog and his faithful skank where's-the-grog.

I fear for my well-being now.

Bwaahaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahw!

Jerry

Ah. Natural aptitude. Thank you.

Please! UNCLE!

Bwaaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahw!!!


Don't cry, Jerry, it's just the flames of puberty starting to
move through your body, nothing to abuse yourself over.

--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

Let there be Nav. Light
 

JL Grasso wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:22:07 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:



JL Grasso wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:57:09 +0930, Tim Fatchen
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:



JL Grasso wrote:

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:59:43 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote in alt.disasters.aviation:



Warrior Princess wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:47:14 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.disasters.aviation:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:12:35 +0930, Flying Tadpole
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:



Madam Vinyl wrote:

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:16:13 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 03:39:04 GMT, "Madam Vinyl"
wrote in alt.sailing.asa:


"JL Grasso" wrote in message
.. .

Is "chunder" like where you make a complete ass of yourself
on
usenet?

You are the authority on this kind of stuff, what do you say?

Yes, I've seen you chundering along for a few years now!


Jerry

Say goodnight, Jerry....

Go **** yourself, stupid ****.

Heheee. I wouldn't have expected any less from you, Jerry.

Why do you continue to torment your opponent when he's clearly
dead?

You'd better batten down the hatches.

So you are saying it's going to be a rough voyage?

Gale-force stupidity from you is predicted.

Blowing wind swells your sails.

That's a sweet little grasso fire you and Mooron have going
there. Did you train it to be self-stoking or was that its
natural aptitude?

Ah, polliwog and his faithful skank where's-the-grog.

I fear for my well-being now.

Bwaahaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahw!

Jerry

Ah. Natural aptitude. Thank you.

Please! UNCLE!

Bwaaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahw!!!


Don't cry, Jerry, it's just the flames of puberty starting to
move through your body, nothing to abuse yourself over.

Yes. You must keep 'em rollin' down at the grade school.



See? You feel _so_ much better now you've admitted it, don't you?
And yes, indeed, it's so rewarding when we as adults finally see
you youngsters actually starting to learn.

--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

Let there be Nav. Light
 

ubject: Let there be Nav. Light
From: "Simple Simon"

Wrong again, Shen44. As soon as the lookout relays
to the bridge that he has a vessel in sight, and he must
do so immediately, then the vessels are in sight. Period,
end of sentence. Any lookout is a legal and binding
extension of the eyes and ears on the bridge. (Yes,
and even if the bridge is asleep which is not a rare
event.)

LOL You "might" be able to find some legal precedence to back this up ....
please show it to me, in context.

At any rate, if in the real world, by this time, who has the greatest
ability
to avoid?
At your height of eye, normally (not always) you should have seen the ship
first and all ready be maneuvering to avoid .... for many reasons.


Negative sir! The Rules require me, as the stand-on vessel to hold
my present speed and course.

Wrong....show me where the rules state you are stand on....give legal
precedence.....your word as an amateur is not valid as legal precedence. (your
knowledge and experience place you in the "weekend warrior" category, also.

The Rules place the burden of
giving way to the motor vessel.

Typically wrong...give me legal precedence and logical statements to prove you
correct....so far you have done neither.

I am only required to do what
is necessary to avoid a collision provided the give-way vessel
is not taking the required action. If a wreck should occur it will
be judged the motor vessel shares the greater share of the liability.

Typically wrong

Now, in your motor boat mentality arrogance you are blatantly
misinterpreting the Rules by saying the stand-on vessel must give
way for its own good. Sorry Mr. Shen44 that's not the way it works.

LOL.....Rule 2....ever read it?

Gawd, watching and reading your latest lame attempts is amusing.......

Shen