CANDChelp wrote:

Who, me, agreeable? Not so.

You just said you were happy with my summary of what Donal actually experienced
and that it reflected what was said earlier.
Are you backpedaling now or standing fast?

Ha! what I said was:

Why Bobsprit! What an inspired application of what you learnt
today about variations in sensitivity resulting from different
rudder specs!

A typically ambiguous FT statement. It is open to multiple
interpretation. You're free to put your interpretation on it.
However, your attempt to move me from ambiguity to standing at
your right hand was a bit crass. Hence my subsequent comment.

--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

It is open to multiple
interpretation. You're free to put your interpretation on it.
However, your attempt to move me from ambiguity to standing at
your right hand was a bit crass. Hence my subsequent comment.

Well written, but I'm afraid the direction of your post puts you at my side,
and opposing Donal's claims. Your protest has otherwise been noted and I fully
appreciate the nature of your objection. It takes a tough soul to admit when
he's wrong and Capt. RB was right.
Within the confines set by the vice-like group mentality, you went as far as
you dared.

RB

CANDChelp wrote:

It takes a tough soul to admit when
he's wrong and Capt. RB was right.


Then obviously you have misinterpreted, since I have the soul of
a fresh-made marshmallow.

--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com