Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does the 37r also come with the 12' high stern ladder?
Scotty "SAIL LOCO" wrote in message ... Why do you suppose C&C went with that? They wanted to be sure the public new they were nothing like the inferior late seventies designs. S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster" Trains are a winter sport |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Found some more info on the cnc web site. looks like its the xl
version. What's a 'passarelle'? Never heard this term. stern gang plank split back stay with dual hydraulic cylinders, Again, that's odd. You only need one to adjust the backstay. Rod rigging running baby back stays, You mean running backs & checks? Yes mast head rig with forward running baby stay. Anyone know this boat? What can you tell me about it? It was intended for (and to a pretty good extent) a fast racer/cruiser, with less emphasis on cruising. They had fancy elliptical foil keels & rudders, and were modeled after the last generation IOR boats... fast, much easier to handle than the earlier designs (despite the web of rigging), and relatively roomy. I kind of like these boats, have been aboard one but not really checked it out or sailed it. I have sailed in company with them, they go. Here are some numbers Designer= Rob Ball LOA= 39.9 LWL= 31.8 Bm= 12.6 Dr= 7.8 Disp= 15,000 Ballast= 7,400 SA= 794 SA/D= 21.0 D/L= 208 Capsize Screen= 1.97 PHRF= 63 Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Found some more info on the cnc web site. looks like its the xl
version. Slick boat. Suzanne and I are looking into the 36 foot version now (34+ or XL)...we plan to trade in Alien in 2005. RB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not that slick. These boats look like they tend to be rode hard and
put away wet. Found severe cracking around the aft chain plates from over enthusiastic use of the hydraulics. Structural cracking at the forward bulkhead from ? High bridge deck gives you seven steps up and down the ladder and no room under a dodger. You are going to need new knees. On 24 Jun 2003 11:56:59 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote: Found some more info on the cnc web site. looks like its the xl version. Slick boat. Suzanne and I are looking into the 36 foot version now (34+ or XL)...we plan to trade in Alien in 2005. RB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Found severe cracking around the aft chain plates from over
enthusiastic use of the hydraulics. There's a 34+ at my club. Not a mark or a crack on her, but then she's not raced. Trick is to find one like that. A good package of performance and comfort for around 65K. RB |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc" wrote in message ... Not that slick. These boats look like they tend to be rode hard and put away wet. A good boat is like a good woman! Regards Donal -- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
High bridge deck gives you seven steps up and down the ladder and no
room under a dodger. I'll take a bridge deck anyday. Easier to get from one side of the cockpit to the other and they make the boat stronger. S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster" Trains are a winter sport |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check out some of the mid-1980s One Tonners and Admirals Cuppers....
definitely designed to the IOR rule. Definitely a resemblance to the C&C "R" and "+" series, at least to my eye. SAIL LOCO wrote: Doug, To me "squared" off areas and sharp bends in the hull indicate IOR influence. Earlier IOR boats, yes. Then, after a long time, designers figured out that a fast boat with a fair hull would beat a weird hull with a couple inches longer unrated LWL. The C&C 34R and 37Rs don't seem to have these influences. I just see a regular canoe underbody with relativly flat areas aft. If it were more like the "big dinghy" style boats, I'd agree. But it is an evolution of hull shape from racers of that era, IMHO looking a bit like the IOR boats (of that era, not the earlier broach coaches). High bridge deck gives you seven steps up and down the ladder and no room under a dodger. SAIL LOCO wrote: I'll take a bridge deck anyday. Easier to get from one side of the cockpit to the other and they make the boat stronger. All that. Also, a bridge deck is good to keep the water from gushing down into the cabin. Frankly, boats without bridge decks strike me as poor risks for hard sailing. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc" wrote in message ... Agreed about the bridge deck. I have one on my boat and am glad for it. However, my perspective is that of a 58 year old cruiser. The bridge deck on th C&C 37 is two tiered. In fact, the vertical hatchboard is no more than 8" tall. If you put a dodger on this beast, you will only have 3' clearance under the boom and a 5' crawl to enter and exit the hatch with 7 steps up and down. My point? Not the user friendliest for a cruising boat. Racing? Who cares, it's fast. At least you got your priorities straight. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
your boat can cook?
"Donal" wrote A good boat is like a good woman! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|