Found some more info on the cnc web site. looks like its the xl
version.

Slick boat. Suzanne and I are looking into the 36 foot version now (34+ or
XL)...we plan to trade in Alien in 2005.

RB

Not that slick. These boats look like they tend to be rode hard and
put away wet.

Found severe cracking around the aft chain plates from over
enthusiastic use of the hydraulics.

Structural cracking at the forward bulkhead from ?

High bridge deck gives you seven steps up and down the ladder and no
room under a dodger. You are going to need new knees.


On 24 Jun 2003 11:56:59 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote:

Found some more info on the cnc web site. looks like its the xl
version.

Slick boat. Suzanne and I are looking into the 36 foot version now (34+ or
XL)...we plan to trade in Alien in 2005.

RB

Found severe cracking around the aft chain plates from over
enthusiastic use of the hydraulics.

There's a 34+ at my club. Not a mark or a crack on her, but then she's not
raced. Trick is to find one like that. A good package of performance and
comfort for around 65K.

RB

"Marc" wrote in message
...
Not that slick. These boats look like they tend to be rode hard and
put away wet.


A good boat is like a good woman!


Regards


Donal
--

your boat can cook?


"Donal" wrote

A good boat is like a good woman!

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
"Donal" wrote

A good boat is like a good woman!

your boat can cook?


No, but Bob's boat really sucks!




Regards


Donal
--

Oh. ha ha ha.

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
"Donal" wrote

A good boat is like a good woman!

your boat can cook?


No, but Bob's boat really sucks!




Regards


Donal
--

High bridge deck gives you seven steps up and down the ladder and no
room under a dodger.

I'll take a bridge deck anyday. Easier to get from one side of the cockpit to
the other and they make the boat stronger.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
Trains are a winter sport

Check out some of the mid-1980s One Tonners and Admirals Cuppers....
definitely
designed to the IOR rule. Definitely a resemblance to the C&C "R" and "+"
series, at least to my eye.

SAIL LOCO wrote:
Doug,
To me "squared" off areas and sharp bends in the hull indicate IOR
influence.

Earlier IOR boats, yes. Then, after a long time, designers figured out that a fast
boat with a fair hull would beat a weird hull with a couple inches longer unrated
LWL.


The C&C 34R and 37Rs don't seem to have these influences. I just
see a regular canoe underbody with relativly flat areas aft.

If it were more like the "big dinghy" style boats, I'd agree. But it is an
evolution of hull shape from racers of that era, IMHO looking a bit like the IOR
boats (of that era, not the earlier broach coaches).



High bridge deck gives you seven steps up and down the ladder and no
room under a dodger.

SAIL LOCO wrote:
I'll take a bridge deck anyday. Easier to get from one side of the cockpit to
the other and they make the boat stronger.

All that. Also, a bridge deck is good to keep the water from gushing down into the
cabin. Frankly, boats without bridge decks strike me as poor risks for hard
sailing.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

All that. Also, a bridge deck is good to keep the water from gushing down
into the
cabin. Frankly, boats without bridge decks strike me as poor risks for hard
sailing.

Agree.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
Trains are a winter sport