"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
anews.com...

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...

"Shad O'Shay" wrote in message
...
This person sounds like a paranoid, revengeful nut case. (and I ain't
talking about Perez) Wow!

http://www.sailsea.org/

Be careful where you go to learn how to sail.


Shad O'Shay



Jonathan did a job no one else wanted (at no pay) for 5 years. He grew
the outfit in size and scope. Many people benefitted from his hard work.
He was the only one qualified to teach the larger and harder classes. The
non profit was nominated for a prestigious award with him at the helm.
He's got an MBA AND USCG captain's license, two combined qualifications
that are hard to find. It was HIS vision and HIS hard, selfless work. Now
that things are up and running smoothly a bunch of ingrate wannabes
wanted to take over and take over they did. It wasn't a simple vote that
got him outed, it was a deliberate conspiracy. Jonathan shouldn't go
back, he is only lowering himself to their standards. He might do much
better creating a new, competing non profit with iron clad bylaws that
don't allow others to commandeer the ship. It won't be the same if he
goes back, hurt feelings and grudges usually can never be put aside. Be
the better man and take the high road, it will serve you well in the long
term. He may have made mistakes, he has admitted them and now he can use
what he has learned to do much, much better. Anger and resentment are
based upon things of the past, hope and vigor are for the future! Carry
the torch forward and may it shine brightly upon all!

Admiral Momsen

Good grief, Momsen, have you taken leave of your senses? Have you been
drinking the liberal Kool Aid? Have you been smoking some of that there
wacky tobaccy? Or perhaps you got ahold of some of Gaynze's 10X strength
LSD?

Get a grip on yourself, Admiral! Next thing you know, if you keep spouting
such nonsense, Obama will come schlepping around and appoint you to head
the Joint Chiefs of Staff!

You need to get a clue. There's some behind-the-scenes information I am
privy to which sheds an entirely new light upon this situation. I can't be
specific at this time but it concerns possible abuse of the non-profit
status of the organization by the fired member. Does the term "under the
table" mean anything to you? This whole episode with the web site and the
feuding is all about a cover-up. Of course the organization wants rid of a
possible huge liability but said liability thinks only about its own hurt
pride. I understand Perez has even been talking to an F. Lee Bailey type
(shhhhh! don't tell anybody).

Can you expand your rigid mind to encompass such a scenario? It happens
all the time. Usually greed is at the core of the misdoings. Greed and a
total disregard for the law. This is how liberals think - laws are for
somebody else.

Wilbur Hubbard


Are you saying he might have been outed because of corruption? That the
possibility of operating a non profit for personal benefit was going on?
Personal enurement? How could that happen? How would he get the
"beancounter" to go along? Naahh...

I think Jonathan is telling the truth. It's just like he says it is. It was
a conspiracy and mutiny against him. The loser half wits tossed him
overboard to run the show. He should up the ante to get reinstated back into
his rightful and hard earned position. Those people who voted against should
be publicly flogged, keel hauled and made to walk the plank! Jonathan, don't
give up the ship or the financial records!