wrote:
Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)

You may have received spam email recently that appears to come from our
campaign, or be about our campaign -- perhaps the "From" and or
"Reply-to" addresses look like they are coming from VoteNader.org. Or
perhaps you have received a message that appears to come from an
individual (if the address is real, the real owner probably did not send
this email either) with suppressed recipients. Or maybe you received an
email that appeared to come from yourself promoting our site.

**** that egomaniac Ralph Nader and all the devil's spawn who supports
him. He's already set this country back four years, and he's aiming at
eight.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:06:15 GMT, rw
wrote:

wrote:
Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)

You may have received spam email recently that appears to come from our
campaign, or be about our campaign -- perhaps the "From" and or
"Reply-to" addresses look like they are coming from VoteNader.org. Or
perhaps you have received a message that appears to come from an
individual (if the address is real, the real owner probably did not send
this email either) with suppressed recipients. Or maybe you received an
email that appeared to come from yourself promoting our site.

**** that egomaniac Ralph Nader and all the devil's spawn who supports
him. He's already set this country back four years, and he's aiming at
eight.


The worst of it is, that I think _this_ message was the SPAM. I'd
seen nothing before it. Hmmm. Reverse ploy by some idiot on his
campaign staff? That'd be as dumb as the Minnesota guy who used his
dead bosses' funeral to make a political speech. Lost his party the
senatorial seat.
--

rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing.
Often taunted by trout.
Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely on it.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

wrote in message
The worst of it is, that I think _this_ message was the SPAM. I'd
seen nothing before it. Hmmm. Reverse ploy by some idiot on his
campaign staff?

From what I've learned, this sort of thing is known as a "Joe Job". Not
that I'm crazy about that. g

Joe F.

I'm with you. The only Nader spam I've seen is the message that started
this thread.

John B.


lid wrote:

On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:06:15 GMT, rw
wrote:


wrote:

Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)

You may have received spam email recently that appears to come from our
campaign, or be about our campaign -- perhaps the "From" and or
"Reply-to" addresses look like they are coming from VoteNader.org. Or
perhaps you have received a message that appears to come from an
individual (if the address is real, the real owner probably did not send
this email either) with suppressed recipients. Or maybe you received an
email that appeared to come from yourself promoting our site.

**** that egomaniac Ralph Nader and all the devil's spawn who supports
him. He's already set this country back four years, and he's aiming at
eight.



The worst of it is, that I think _this_ message was the SPAM. I'd
seen nothing before it. Hmmm. Reverse ploy by some idiot on his
campaign staff? That'd be as dumb as the Minnesota guy who used his
dead bosses' funeral to make a political speech. Lost his party the
senatorial seat.

don't too much disagree with you but the post has nothing to do with Nader,
that's a front

john

"rw" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote:
Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)

You may have received spam email recently that appears to come from our
campaign, or be about our campaign -- perhaps the "From" and or
"Reply-to" addresses look like they are coming from VoteNader.org. Or
perhaps you have received a message that appears to come from an
individual (if the address is real, the real owner probably did not send
this email either) with suppressed recipients. Or maybe you received an
email that appeared to come from yourself promoting our site.

**** that egomaniac Ralph Nader and all the devil's spawn who supports
him. He's already set this country back four years, and he's aiming at
eight.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Spoken like a truly arrogant Fascist.

Bob C.
Idahoan for Ralph Nader

"rw" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote:
Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)

You may have received spam email recently that appears to come from our
campaign, or be about our campaign -- perhaps the "From" and or
"Reply-to" addresses look like they are coming from VoteNader.org. Or
perhaps you have received a message that appears to come from an
individual (if the address is real, the real owner probably did not send
this email either) with suppressed recipients. Or maybe you received an
email that appeared to come from yourself promoting our site.

**** that egomaniac Ralph Nader and all the devil's spawn who supports
him. He's already set this country back four years, and he's aiming at
eight.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Bob in Idaho wrote:
Spoken like a truly arrogant Fascist.

Bob C.
Idahoan for Ralph Nader

Supporting Ralph Nader in Idaho is a perfect example of futility and
ineffectuality. Fortunately for those of us who are sane, your
particular vote for Ralph, assuming he even makes it onto the ballot,
won't make a damn bit of difference.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the
outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those
votes were are cast.

Bob C.
Idahoan for Nader
"rw" wrote in message
ink.net...
Bob in Idaho wrote:
Spoken like a truly arrogant Fascist.

Bob C.
Idahoan for Ralph Nader

Supporting Ralph Nader in Idaho is a perfect example of futility and
ineffectuality. Fortunately for those of us who are sane, your
particular vote for Ralph, assuming he even makes it onto the ballot,
won't make a damn bit of difference.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Bob in Idaho wrote:
Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the
outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where those
votes were are cast.

How about, for example, Florida in 2000?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican
George Bush"
-San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 9, 2000

The Greens received 97,488 votes and the votes cast for all other candidates
and write-ins amounted to 40,579 --grand total of 138,067. So one could
logically conclude from these figures that NO votes cast for Ralph Nader had
any affect on the outcome. However, had registered Democrats trusted their
parties choice, George Bush would likely be reading comic books at his Texas
ranch rather than in the White House.

If figures don't impress you, please, explain how you can conclude that
votes not cast for Nader (or any of the other non-major candidates)
automatically convert in to votes for Gore?

Bob C.
Idahoan for Nader

"rw" wrote in message
ink.net...
Bob in Idaho wrote:
Precisely! Votes cast for Ralph Nader have absolutely no affect on the
outcome of the race between the two main candidates, no matter where
those
votes were are cast.

How about, for example, Florida in 2000?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.