Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Daly wrote:
On 22-Dec-2003, Peter wrote: Heat loss is irrelevant compared to this. Not so.[...] Agreed. [...] My point is that if there is no vapour barrier, then soaking your insulation is a serious problem, whereas adding the vapour barrier only increases the temperature rating a bit. If you want warmer, buy a heavier bag; if you want dry insulation, get a vapour barrier. Increased warmth is a byproduct of using a vapour barrier, not a reason for buying one. It was for me. I didn't have a problem with my insulation getting wet, but sometimes it was getting a bit cold for the rating of my bag. Your suggestion would have cost me a couple hundred dollars for another bag and added another pound to my pack. A vapor barrier cost less than $10 and added only a few ounces. Also doubles as a useful item to have for emergencies on dayhikes just in case you need to bivouac somewhere (which is why I got it initially). I only heard that it was called a vapor barrier and that it solved the wet insulation problem from condensation a few years after I started using it for the added warmth. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some chilling thoughts on winter boating. | General | |||
FS: Kover Klamp Winter Framing Kit in MA | Marketplace | |||
A great summer of crusing or Let's Ban Power Boats! | General |