On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:58:27 -0500, "HEMI - Powered"
wrote:

JR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...


Three ships of the Portuguese cod fishing fleet, off Newfoundland,
circa 1960-62

JR, are these your scans or did you download them from somewhere?

These are scans of photos taken by my father. He was a medic in some
of these ships, in the early 60s'. Unfortunately I have only 1 more
photo of just a tall ship. The rest are not on-topic for this group.

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:14:49 +0100, JR wrote:

On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:58:27 -0500, "HEMI - Powered"
wrote:

JR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...


Three ships of the Portuguese cod fishing fleet, off Newfoundland,
circa 1960-62

JR, are these your scans or did you download them from somewhere?

These are scans of photos taken by my father. He was a medic in some
of these ships, in the early 60s'. Unfortunately I have only 1 more
photo of just a tall ship. The rest are not on-topic for this group.
What are the rest about? We have a fairly broad interest here. Of the
sea is a great wide interest.

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:40:00 GMT, joevan
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:14:49 +0100, JR wrote:

On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:58:27 -0500, "HEMI - Powered"
wrote:

JR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...


Three ships of the Portuguese cod fishing fleet, off Newfoundland,
circa 1960-62

JR, are these your scans or did you download them from somewhere?

These are scans of photos taken by my father. He was a medic in some
of these ships, in the early 60s'. Unfortunately I have only 1 more
photo of just a tall ship. The rest are not on-topic for this group.
What are the rest about? We have a fairly broad interest here. Of the
sea is a great wide interest.

St Johns, icebergs, some old cargo ships...

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:18:39 +0100, JR wrote:

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:40:00 GMT, joevan
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:14:49 +0100, JR wrote:

On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:58:27 -0500, "HEMI - Powered"
wrote:

JR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...


Three ships of the Portuguese cod fishing fleet, off Newfoundland,
circa 1960-62

JR, are these your scans or did you download them from somewhere?

These are scans of photos taken by my father. He was a medic in some
of these ships, in the early 60s'. Unfortunately I have only 1 more
photo of just a tall ship. The rest are not on-topic for this group.
What are the rest about? We have a fairly broad interest here. Of the
sea is a great wide interest.

St Johns, icebergs, some old cargo ships...
Some here would like to see them if you have the time to share. If you
look back you will see a lot of variety here.

JR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

Three ships of the Portuguese cod fishing fleet, off Newfoundland,
circa 1960-62

JR, are these your scans or did you download them from somewhere?

These are scans of photos taken by my father. He was a medic in some
of these ships, in the early 60s'. Unfortunately I have only 1 more
photo of just a tall ship. The rest are not on-topic for this group.
What are the rest about? We have a fairly broad interest here. Of the
sea is a great wide interest.

St Johns, icebergs, some old cargo ships...

go ahead and post 'em!


--
HP, aka Jerry

"You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a ****!"

JR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

Three ships of the Portuguese cod fishing fleet, off Newfoundland,
circa 1960-62

JR, are these your scans or did you download them from somewhere?

These are scans of photos taken by my father. He was a medic in some
of these ships, in the early 60s'. Unfortunately I have only 1 more
photo of just a tall ship. The rest are not on-topic for this group.

JR, from what I have heard since coming here just a few months ago, just
about anything at all that floats is on-topic enough to post, so please
do unless you also mean your father's pics are also "inappropriate". Too
bad you don't have the original photos as modern technology might be able
to increase the quality of already good scans.

--
HP, aka Jerry

"You've obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a ****!"

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:04:03 -0500, "HEMI - Powered"
wrote:

JR, from what I have heard since coming here just a few months ago, just
about anything at all that floats is on-topic enough to post, so please
do unless you also mean your father's pics are also "inappropriate". Too
bad you don't have the original photos as modern technology might be able
to increase the quality of already good scans.

These scans *are* of the original photos... I spent some time in
paintshop "working" some of them, but the original camera was a cheap
model anyway...

JR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

JR, from what I have heard since coming here just a few months ago,
just about anything at all that floats is on-topic enough to post,
so please do unless you also mean your father's pics are also
"inappropriate". Too bad you don't have the original photos as
modern technology might be able to increase the quality of already
good scans.

These scans *are* of the original photos... I spent some time in
paintshop "working" some of them, but the original camera was a
cheap model anyway...

OK. Then, why are they so noisy? Maybe because the originals were grainy,
perhaps from a high-speed film and/or print paper? I should have
clarified my question in the beginning. I'm hardly criticizing the
photography whether it was a good or not so good camera nor your efforts
as a scanner. What actually caught my eye was the large size in KB of the
images which I recognized as coming from the noise. Scanners convert
either half-tone printing process "dots" or silver halide film negs and
prints grain as geometrically random noise in the scan, which I'm sure
you know how to control with descreening at scan time and various noise
reduction techniques in PS or other graphics app.

--
HP, aka Jerry

"If it waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck"

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:47:43 +0100, JR wrote:

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:04:03 -0500, "HEMI - Powered"
wrote:

JR, from what I have heard since coming here just a few months ago, just
about anything at all that floats is on-topic enough to post, so please
do unless you also mean your father's pics are also "inappropriate". Too
bad you don't have the original photos as modern technology might be able
to increase the quality of already good scans.

These scans *are* of the original photos... I spent some time in
paintshop "working" some of them, but the original camera was a cheap
model anyway...
Thank you for taking your time to get these wonderful pictures to us.
I for one think they are of historical importance and you should
treasure them. Thanks for sharing them here.