Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 10, 10:55*am, wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:47:28 GMT, Steve wrote: They didn't have to have a rewind. *Have you ever tried to rewind an 8-track to get to some part of a song you like again, or to get to the song before the one you're listening to? You don't rewind 8 tracks, they are one way but I assume you were trying to make that point. On the other hand there are 4 songs available at any time. If you don't like your music enough to listen to it all, why did you load it on the tape? I agree an MP3 player is preferable to any tape format but this was 1968. Digital sound was just a dream. The only people with computers big enough to actually play an MP3 would have been the government or a big corporation and that computer would weigh 10,000 pounds, filling a pretty good sized room 8 track was a bad design. It relied on the tape slipping as it wound up. So tape was always sliding against tape. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
a few things | Whitewater | |||
Things you just can't do without! | General |