Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you
do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy
of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout
of the information stored in an electronic database.

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu.
I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama
hasn't let this information be released. In the best case it would
put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the
charges that Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out.
What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to run for the
presidency? What do you do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy
of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout
of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his certificate
of live birth.

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the
9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu.
I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama
hasn't let this information be released. In the best case it would
put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the
charges that Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out.
What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to run for the
presidency? What do you do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if
the right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true
copy of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a
printout of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his certificate
of live birth.

The fact that a requirement to be President of the United States of
America shall be a natural born citizen of the United States.

Would it bother you if there were questions surrounding the birth of a
Republican?

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the
9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he
says he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in
Honolulu. I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and
up, Obama hasn't let this information be released. In the best case
it would put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some
validity to the charges that Obama is hiding something then it is
going to come out. What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to
run for the presidency? What do you do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if
the right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true
copy of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a
printout of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his
certificate of live birth.

The fact that a requirement to be President of the United States of
America shall be a natural born citizen of the United States.

Would it bother you if there were questions surrounding the birth of a
Republican?


Indeed, I could never figure out how George H.W. Bush could have a son
as bright as Jeb and one as dull as George W. Different parents?

"Boater" wrote in message
...
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history.
He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the
9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is,
an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you
do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy
of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout
of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his certificate of
live birth.

He seems to give a crap about what most of us want. But he is a great
orator from the telepromter.

"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history.
He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is,
an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you do
with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy of
the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout of
the information stored in an electronic database.

So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

D.Duck wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history.
He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?
Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is,
an American citizen born in Hawaii.
It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you do
with his running mate?
Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?
Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy of
the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout of
the information stored in an electronic database.

So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html




Again, I see no reason to supply this sort of information to those who
would not vote for Obama under any circumstances. Screw 'em.

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...


So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html



Yup. It could have been so simple.

Eisboch

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:10:23 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"D.Duck" wrote in message
om...


So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html



Yup. It could have been so simple.

Eisboch

are you guys dense?

Summary
In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his
birth certificate to quell speculative charges that he might not be a
natural-born citizen.

That is NOT a copy of the original.


I think the Annenberg folks are a non-partisan group and they seem convinced
that they have seen, touched and photographed a *certified* copy (NOT the
original) of Obama's birth record. a certified copy in this format is
accepted by the State Department for passport purposes.

We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined
and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets
all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S.
citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are
false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as
"supporting documents" to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in
the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html


The following photos are linked on the above page:

http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFil...tificate_7.jpg

http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFil...tificate_1.jpg

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:10:23 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"D.Duck" wrote in message
om...


So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html



Yup. It could have been so simple.

Eisboch

are you guys dense?

Summary
In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his
birth certificate to quell speculative charges that he might not be a
natural-born citizen.

That is NOT a copy of the original.

It doesn't matter. In the eyes of the law (and that's all that matters
here) the document referenced in Duck's post satisfies the requirement of
a challenge to his natural born status.

It's too bad my wife and I had to fight tooth and nail to get "proof" that
our oldest son was a citizen of the USA, even though born overseas while I
was serving active duty in the military. Requests for help to resolve this
issue to our local, "veteran sensitive" United States Senator John Kerry
went totally unanswered.

BTW .... he may be facing a serious challenge to his 24 year "career" in the
Senate on Tuesday.
I hope like hell the voters give him the bum's rush out the door.

Eisboch