|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,666
|
|
53-42
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:
If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the
9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?
Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he
says he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.
It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in
Honolulu. I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and
up, Obama hasn't let this information be released. In the best case
it would put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some
validity to the charges that Obama is hiding something then it is
going to come out. What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to
run for the presidency? What do you do with his running mate?
Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if
the right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?
Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true
copy of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a
printout of the information stored in an electronic database.
I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his
certificate of live birth.
The fact that a requirement to be President of the United States of
America shall be a natural born citizen of the United States.
Would it bother you if there were questions surrounding the birth of a
Republican?
Indeed, I could never figure out how George H.W. Bush could have a son
as bright as Jeb and one as dull as George W. Different parents?
|