|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,227
|
|
53-42
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:
If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the
9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?
Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.
It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu.
I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama
hasn't let this information be released. In the best case it would
put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the
charges that Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out.
What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to run for the
presidency? What do you do with his running mate?
Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if
the right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?
Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true
copy of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a
printout of the information stored in an electronic database.
I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his certificate
of live birth.
The fact that a requirement to be President of the United States of
America shall be a natural born citizen of the United States.
Would it bother you if there were questions surrounding the birth of a
Republican?
|