"Jim" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
Bush speaks at 8 am.

Stock market is tanking.




Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the
heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-)


I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I
sorta understood it).

According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes,
yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January.

Cool, huh?

Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. Obama claims
that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan.
Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. How do you get 95% out of 60%?

Is this the *new* math that I missed?

Eisboch

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:03:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
Bush speaks at 8 am.

Stock market is tanking.




Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the
heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-)


I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I
sorta understood it).

According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes,
yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January.

Cool, huh?

Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. Obama claims
that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan.
Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. How do you get 95% out of 60%?

Is this the *new* math that I missed?

Eisboch


If you just heard that, you need to listen to that station more often.
It'll never make the major media, but the fact has been known for quite a
while. Why McCain has not commented on it is beyond me. Maybe he's afraid
of hurting the feelings of the 30-40 percent of Americans who pay no taxes.
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

Eisboch wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
Bush speaks at 8 am.

Stock market is tanking.



Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the
heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-)


I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I
sorta understood it).

According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes,
yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January.

Cool, huh?

Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. Obama claims
that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan.
Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. How do you get 95% out of 60%?

Is this the *new* math that I missed?

Eisboch


Pretty simple
40% pay no taxes
that leaves 60%
95% of 60% is 57%
57% will have their taxes reduced.
95% of the remainder will have their taxes cut.
That leaves 3%.
I'm guessing that that 3% level is Around $200,000 annual income. I
think I've heard Barry suggest a number somewhere around that figure.
I don't blame Barry for what comes out of his mouth. It's his speech
writers that do all the cyphering. And we know all about speech writers,
don't we. ;-)

On Oct 14, 11:03*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...

Eisboch wrote:
Bush speaks at 8 am.

Stock market is tanking.

Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the
heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-)

I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I
sorta understood it).

According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes,
yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January.

Cool, huh?

Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. * Obama claims
that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan.
Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. * How do you get 95% out of 60%?

Is this the *new* math that I missed?

Eisboch

It's a lie, he changes his tune every time he gets in front of a
different audience.

..
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

John H wrote:
.


Facts about John Herring:

Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar.

On Oct 14, 12:08*pm, HK wrote:
John H wrote:
.

Facts about John Herring:

Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar.

..

..
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

HK wrote:
John H wrote:
.


Facts about John Herring:

Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar.

That's enough for a libel suit.

John?

DK wrote:
HK wrote:
John H wrote:
.


Facts about John Herring:

Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar.

That's enough for a libel suit.

John?


Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record,
as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher.

ESAD, conservatrash.