Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Republicans Are Sissies" wrote in message
...
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.
We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any
partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech
on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate
sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to
vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the
economy.
As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.
How many democrats voted against the bill? Were they offended by
Nancy too?
A Bill brought to the Congress by a Republican President by his Secretary
of
the Treasury got more support from Democrats than Republicans.
I didn't think it was a good bill but to have it fail for twelve votes
that
should have been forthcoming from Republican ranks isn't due to Nancy
Pelosi's remarks. It is another failure by George Bush and John McCain
lead
effectively.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, the republicans voting their conscience while Nancy Pelosi tried
to cover for the dems who voted with the coming election in mind is
the problem? No. It's just more dishonest voodo like when Pelosi told
her legions to go ahead and "say" they were in favor of drilling, all
the while with a wink and a nod, promising to make sure they never had
to cast that vote.. No, Nancy was only trying to cover the spread, and
it didn't work. I bet if you look, you will find the dems who voted no
were up for re-election this term and could not risk voting a party
line...

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called for this
bill. It was Republican administration officials, including all of their
Treasury and economic advisors. It was the Republican-appointed Fed
Chairman. It was the House minority leader. It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account to
fund their pet projects.

BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

John R. Carroll wrote:
BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?
It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.


Not yet.

On Sep 29, 7:53 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

Democrats caused this problem by FORCING lenders to make subprime
loans to risky borrowers. Yes, FORCED. When it was pointed out that
this was causing problems in 2005, they continued to defend the
practice and said Fannie MAe and Freddie Mac were in fine shape. In
return, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gave he Dems boatloads of money.
Let the Dems solve the problem they caused.

wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:53 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

Democrats caused this problem by FORCING lenders to make subprime
loans to risky borrowers. Yes, FORCED. When it was pointed out that
this was causing problems in 2005, they continued to defend the
practice and said Fannie MAe and Freddie Mac were in fine shape. In
return, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gave he Dems boatloads of money.
Let the Dems solve the problem they caused.

You freaking moron. What do you read for your information, _Mortgage
Broker's News_?

Nobody had to force them to do anything. Once they had Moody's and Standard
& Poor's in the bag, which made a ready market for unseasoned junk
mortgages, they just took off on their own. It was like a license to print
money, brought to you courtesy of Reagonomics in its full flower.

--
Ed Huntress

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:53:09 -0700, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:

BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com


Whats Acorn then? that- in -itself is enough to kill the bill
DaveB

DaveB wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:53:09 -0700, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:

BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials,
including all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority
leader. It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold
of Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank
account to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.



Whats Acorn then? that- in -itself is enough to kill the bill

Nothing that was part of the bill.
Have you read it?
I have.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

I am glad that common sense prevailed and that "bailout of John
McCain" did not pass.

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...
BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com



Do a little research.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArti...07321604674409

Calif Bill wrote:
"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...
BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?
It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.
There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com



Do a little research.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArti...07321604674409



IBD is a reich-wing rag. Citing it as a source in this matter is folly.

--
http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6