On Sep 29, 7:17*pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Republicans Are Sissies" wrote in message
.. .

Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any
partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech
on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate
sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to
vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the
economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

How many democrats voted against the bill? *Were they offended by
Nancy too?

A Bill brought to the Congress by a Republican President by his Secretary of
the Treasury got more support from Democrats than Republicans.
I didn't think it was a good bill but to have it fail for twelve votes that
should have been forthcoming from Republican ranks isn't due to Nancy
Pelosi's remarks. It is another failure by George Bush and John McCain lead
effectively.

--

* * * * * *John R. Carroll
*www.machiningsolution.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, the republicans voting their conscience while Nancy Pelosi tried
to cover for the dems who voted with the coming election in mind is
the problem? No. It's just more dishonest voodo like when Pelosi told
her legions to go ahead and "say" they were in favor of drilling, all
the while with a wink and a nod, promising to make sure they never had
to cast that vote.. No, Nancy was only trying to cover the spread, and
it didn't work. I bet if you look, you will find the dems who voted no
were up for re-election this term and could not risk voting a party
line...

wrote:
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Republicans Are Sissies" wrote in message
...

I bet if you look, you will find the dems who voted no
were up for re-election this term and could not risk voting a party
line...

Senator McCain, is that you?
LOL
The Congress has two year terms. They are all up for reelection.

55 republicans followed their leadership while 153 democrats did.
This, on a bill brought to the floor by a sitting Republican Presidents
administration.

I think the no voters did the righ thing but Nancy Pelosi has much less
influence on them than their own President and leaders.
Statements to the contrary are laughable.
Please give Cindy back her Blackberry.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Republicans Are Sissies" wrote in message
.. .

Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any
partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech
on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate
sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to
vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the
economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

How many democrats voted against the bill? Were they offended by
Nancy too?

A Bill brought to the Congress by a Republican President by his Secretary
of
the Treasury got more support from Democrats than Republicans.
I didn't think it was a good bill but to have it fail for twelve votes
that
should have been forthcoming from Republican ranks isn't due to Nancy
Pelosi's remarks. It is another failure by George Bush and John McCain
lead
effectively.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, the republicans voting their conscience while Nancy Pelosi tried
to cover for the dems who voted with the coming election in mind is
the problem? No. It's just more dishonest voodo like when Pelosi told
her legions to go ahead and "say" they were in favor of drilling, all
the while with a wink and a nod, promising to make sure they never had
to cast that vote.. No, Nancy was only trying to cover the spread, and
it didn't work. I bet if you look, you will find the dems who voted no
were up for re-election this term and could not risk voting a party
line...

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called for this
bill. It was Republican administration officials, including all of their
Treasury and economic advisors. It was the Republican-appointed Fed
Chairman. It was the House minority leader. It was Bush himself.

Get it?

--
Ed Huntress

Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Republicans Are Sissies" wrote in message
...

to cast that vote.. No, Nancy was only trying to cover the spread,
and
it didn't work. I bet if you look, you will find the dems who voted
no were up for re-election this term and could not risk voting a
party line...

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?


Did you see McCain read his statement on the tube Ed?
He said he'd worked his tail off but that Obama had torpedoed the deal.
LOL
I'm pretty sure John McCain knows how to count votes and what he and Bush
couldn't do was get twelve Republican votes for their own bill.
They didn't poll even a majority of their own party.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Republicans Are Sissies" wrote in message
...
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.
We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any
partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech
on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate
sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to
vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the
economy.
As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.
How many democrats voted against the bill? Were they offended by
Nancy too?
A Bill brought to the Congress by a Republican President by his Secretary
of
the Treasury got more support from Democrats than Republicans.
I didn't think it was a good bill but to have it fail for twelve votes
that
should have been forthcoming from Republican ranks isn't due to Nancy
Pelosi's remarks. It is another failure by George Bush and John McCain
lead
effectively.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, the republicans voting their conscience while Nancy Pelosi tried
to cover for the dems who voted with the coming election in mind is
the problem? No. It's just more dishonest voodo like when Pelosi told
her legions to go ahead and "say" they were in favor of drilling, all
the while with a wink and a nod, promising to make sure they never had
to cast that vote.. No, Nancy was only trying to cover the spread, and
it didn't work. I bet if you look, you will find the dems who voted no
were up for re-election this term and could not risk voting a party
line...

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called for this
bill. It was Republican administration officials, including all of their
Treasury and economic advisors. It was the Republican-appointed Fed
Chairman. It was the House minority leader. It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account to
fund their pet projects.

BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:53:09 -0700, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:

BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com


Whats Acorn then? that- in -itself is enough to kill the bill
DaveB

John R. Carroll wrote:
BAR wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?
It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account
to fund their pet projects.

There wasn't a single direction on the use of the funds.
Not one.
There was strict oversight but NO earmarking.


Not yet.

John R. Carroll wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sep 29, 7:17 pm, "John R. Carroll"
wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Republicans Are Sissies" wrote in message
...
to cast that vote.. No, Nancy was only trying to cover the spread,
and
it didn't work. I bet if you look, you will find the dems who voted
no were up for re-election this term and could not risk voting a
party line...
Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called
for this bill. It was Republican administration officials, including
all of their Treasury and economic advisors. It was the
Republican-appointed Fed Chairman. It was the House minority leader.
It was Bush himself.

Get it?


Did you see McCain read his statement on the tube Ed?
He said he'd worked his tail off but that Obama had torpedoed the deal.
LOL
I'm pretty sure John McCain knows how to count votes and what he and Bush
couldn't do was get twelve Republican votes for their own bill.
They didn't poll even a majority of their own party.


Doesn't matter, all the blame goes to Pelosi and her little foot
stomping speech on the floor of the house prior to the vote. That is all
anyone is going to remember.

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:49:56 -0400, BAR wrote:

Ed Huntress wrote:

Hey, jackass: It was Bush and the Republican leadership who called for this
bill. It was Republican administration officials, including all of their
Treasury and economic advisors. It was the Republican-appointed Fed
Chairman. It was the House minority leader. It was Bush himself.

Get it?

It was the Democrats who saw this as an opportunity to grab a hold of
Wall Street, by the balls, and use it as their personal bank account to
fund their pet projects.

It's funny to see the Dems jump into bed with the Wall Street fat
cats. What you said has a lot of truth in it. When Wall Street
comes running to the guv for help, the guv becomes their mama.
The left wing Dems would love having Wall Street by the balls.
Anytime opposition talks about the "Free Enterprise" system now
in opposing a guv project, the lefties will just say, "Shush up honey,
don't talk that way to your mama."
And they'd be right.

--Vic