On Sep 21, 4:44*am, A Real Boater wrote:
Subpoena me?
Todd Palin brushes off subpoena from panel investigating Troopergate

Sun, Sep 21, 2008 (2:07 a.m.)

How many people would have the gall to tell a legislative committee they
were going to ignore its subpoena because they had travel plans? Oh, and
that they did not believe the committee’s investigation was legitimate.

You trust the news media too much on this..
1) His attorney advised him not to appear because it wasn't fully
necessary
2) This is not the non-partison investigation that Palin herself asked
for. This is an investigation headed by an Alaskan Democat.

-robert

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:10:01 -0700, Robert M. Gary wrote:

2) This is not the non-partison investigation that Palin herself asked
for. This is an investigation headed by an Alaskan Democat.

-robert

LOL, that Democrat was appointed by the Alaska Legislative Council, a
body made up of 4 Democrats and *8* Republicans.

On Sep 21, 10:18*am, wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:10:01 -0700, Robert M. Gary wrote:
2) This is not the non-partison investigation that Palin herself asked
for. This is an investigation headed by an Alaskan Democat.

-robert

LOL, that Democrat was appointed by the Alaska Legislative Council, a
body made up of 4 Democrats and *8* Republicans.

Yea, Palin took down the top Republican in the state when she found
out he was corrupt. She has made a lot of enemies in old school
politics. She's really going to shake things up but she isn't making
friends of polititians.That's probably why she has the highest
approval rating of any gov.

-Robert

On Sep 21, 12:10*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:

You trust the news media too much on this..
1) His attorney advised him not to appear because it wasn't fully
necessary
2) This is not the non-partison investigation that Palin herself asked
for. This is an investigation headed by an Alaskan Democat.

-robert

Please don't feed the village troll. He's stupid and will snap at
anything.