Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:06:20 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 22, 7:29*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:23 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 22, 3:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote: On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of Sarah Palin. You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is. What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you see a request in this thread? This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when or where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem. You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line. Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program. You are a pathological liar: Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go to Barack's social programs. You're making **** up again. *You claimed that I asked for a cite. * That's another lie. You're boring. -- Regards, Curly Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. *Now be a good little squirrel and go dig up your nuts. The thread is here, where did I ask you for a cite? *Show us the request that launched your distraction. *You cannot, it doesn't exist, just like most of the fantasies pouring out of your (virtual) mouth. It exists. You're lying again. I choose not to play your squirrelly little rodent games. You cannot substantiate your lie so you devolve into insults. "Other indicators: 1) Rage attacks after they realize you're questioning their lies. 2) Distraction techniques, e.g. hanging up the phone when you catch them in lie, playing word games, or even just running out of the room. After using the distraction technique, or rage attack, or sometimes both, they will pretend that nothing ever happened. They re-write history, so it never did happen in their minds. Normal people do it too, but these people take it to the extreme." http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_yo...hological_liar Even if your nose lights up, Santa won't let you to chew on his reindeer's nuts. See above. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 22, 11:51*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:06:20 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 22, 7:29*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:23 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 22, 3:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote: On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of Sarah Palin. You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is. What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you see a request in this thread? This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when or where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem. You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line.. Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program. You are a pathological liar: Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go to Barack's social programs. You're making **** up again. *You claimed that I asked for a cite.. * That's another lie. You're boring. -- Regards, Curly Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. *Now be a good little squirrel and go dig up your nuts. The thread is here, where did I ask you for a cite? *Show us the request that launched your distraction. *You cannot, it doesn't exist, just like most of the fantasies pouring out of your (virtual) mouth. It exists. You're lying again. *I choose not to play your squirrelly little rodent games. You cannot substantiate your lie so you devolve into insults. Liar. I call you on your lies when you lie. There is no need to cite your previous posting because that's what I'm replying to. Sheesh! No wonder Argentina has coups and revolutions so frequently... "Other indicators: 1) Rage attacks after they realize you're questioning their lies. 2) Distraction techniques, e.g. hanging up the phone when you catch them in lie, playing word games, or even just running out of the room. After using the distraction technique, or rage attack, or sometimes both, they will pretend that nothing ever happened. They re-write history, so it never did happen in their minds. Normal people do it too, but these people take it to the extreme."http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_you_tell_if_someone_is_a_pathologic... Lies by diversion. Even if your nose lights up, Santa won't let you to chew on his reindeer's nuts. See above. -- Regards, Curly Troll. |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:47:22 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 22, 11:51Â*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:06:20 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 22, 7:29Â*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:23 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 22, 3:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 21, 4:37Â*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote: On Sep 21, 1:32Â*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 15, 1:13ÂÂ*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of Sarah Palin. You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is. What are you babbling about now? Â*I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you see a request in this thread? This is the cite you've asked for. Â*If you don't remember when or where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem. You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line. Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program. You are a pathological liar: Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go to Barack's social programs. You're making **** up again. Â*You claimed that I asked for a cite. Â* That's another lie. You're boring. -- Regards, Curly Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. Â*Now be a good little squirrel and go dig up your nuts. The thread is here, where did I ask you for a cite? Â*Show us the request that launched your distraction. Â*You cannot, it doesn't exist, just like most of the fantasies pouring out of your (virtual) mouth. It exists. You're lying again. Â*I choose not to play your squirrelly little rodent games. You cannot substantiate your lie so you devolve into insults. Liar. I call you on your lies when you lie. There is no need to cite your previous posting because that's what I'm replying to. You haven't, and cannot, show where I asked for a cite in this thread. It doesn't exist. You'r lying. Again. If it were an accident or misspeak then you'd admit such and move on however your choice has been to stone wall and throw more lies to defend the original lie. Dumb move. Sheesh! No wonder Argentina has coups and revolutions so frequently... "Other indicators: 1) Rage attacks after they realize you're questioning their lies. 2) Distraction techniques, e.g. hanging up the phone when you catch them in lie, playing word games, or even just running out of the room. After using the distraction technique, or rage attack, or sometimes both, they will pretend that nothing ever happened. They re-write history, so it never did happen in their minds. Normal people do it too, but these people take it to the extreme."http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_you_tell_if_someone_is_a_pathologic... Lies by diversion. Easy to prove, show us where I requested a cite in this thread. You cannot so you lie more to mask the original lie. Really dumb move. Even if your nose lights up, Santa won't let you to chew on his reindeer's nuts. See above. -- Regards, Curly Troll. Ah, when you get called out on your lies we're trolls but when you throw lies into the conversation it's not trolling. You are a hypocrite too. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General |